{"id":2546,"date":"2022-08-28T14:21:23","date_gmt":"2022-08-28T19:21:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/?p=2546"},"modified":"2022-08-28T17:24:18","modified_gmt":"2022-08-28T22:24:18","slug":"south-carolina-christians-beware-fake-pro-life-sic-bill-h5399-de-humanizes-the-unborn-h5399-preserves-abortion-in-the-sc-code-of-laws","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/2022\/08\/28\/south-carolina-christians-beware-fake-pro-life-sic-bill-h5399-de-humanizes-the-unborn-h5399-preserves-abortion-in-the-sc-code-of-laws\/","title":{"rendered":"South Carolina Christians Beware ! FAKE “PRO-LIFE” [sic] BILL H5399 DE-HUMANIZES THE UNBORN; H5399 PRESERVES\u00a0“ABORTION” IN THE SC CODE OF LAWS"},"content":{"rendered":"

Original Posted August 27, 2022; Revised and Edited August 28, 2022
\n\"\"<\/p>\n

South Carolina Christians Beware !
\n<\/b><\/span>FAKE “PRO-LIFE” [sic]<\/em><\/span> BILL H5399<\/a> DE-HUMANIZES THE UNBORN; H5399<\/a> PRESERVES<\/u><\/span><\/em>\u00a0“ABORTION”<\/span> IN THE SC CODE OF LAWS<\/b><\/strong>
\n<\/span>_______________________________________________
\n
\n<\/span>As the Recommended Language<\/a> which became H5399<\/a> was passed by the SC House Ad Hoc Committee, and by the House Judiciary Special Laws Subcommittee, and by the full House Judiciary Committee, unchanged at each step, H5399<\/a> presently contains the following as it comes out onto the Floor of the SC House of Representatives on Tuesday, August 30 for debate:
\n<\/span><\/b>
\n<\/span>1) “Permitted Abortion”
\n<\/span>Section 44-41-830.(B) [ IAW the circumstances specified in Section 44-41-830. ]
\n<\/span><\/b>INSTEAD OF A TOTAL BAN ON INTENTIONALLY KILLING THE UNBORN<\/span><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 See 2012 Dublin Declaration<\/a> on Maternal Healthcare<\/strong><\/p>\n

Note<\/span><\/u>: Incredibly, H5399<\/a> even explicitly requires<\/u><\/span><\/em> in new proposed Section 44-41-890.<\/a> the preservation<\/u> <\/span><\/em>of the SC Legislature’s <\/a>material codification<\/a> in 1974 of the Roe v. Wade<\/em><\/a> “Abortion” f<\/a>ramework<\/a> which exists TODAY<\/span> in the current SC Code of Laws<\/a>,
\nin Section 44-41-20.<\/a>, which is entitled “Legal” [sic]<\/em> “Abortions.”.\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/strong>
\n2) Protection only at point of “Clinically Diagnosable Pregnancy”
\n<\/span>Section 44-41-810.(1)<\/span><\/strong>
\nINSTEAD OF PROTECTING ALL HUMAN LIFE BEGINNING AT CONCEPTION<\/span><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/strong>
\n3) “Organism of the Species Homo Sapiens<\/a>”
\n<\/span>Section 44-41-810.(7)<\/span><\/strong>
\nDETESTABLE TERMINOLOGY COMPATIBLE WITH ANTI-CREATOR, ANTI-CREATION, DARWINIAN EVOLUTION
\n<\/a><\/span><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"
\n_______________________________________________
\n
\n<\/span>The H5399<\/a>\/SC House Ad Hoc Committee\/Judiciary Committee\/SCCL\/Rep McCravy Bill is a BIG LIE.<\/span><\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

PRETENDING in the UNENFORCEABLE<\/span> Legislative Findings to Recognize the Unborn as Persons <\/span><\/span><\/strong>whose Life Begins at Conception, BUT NOT DOING SO WHERE IT MATTERS,<\/span> IN THE ACTUAL <\/strong>PROPOSED CHANGES TO CODE SECTIONS IN TITLE 44, CHAPTER 41 – “Abortions<\/a>“.<\/strong><\/p>\n

MESSAGE TO CHRISTIAN PRO-LIFERS:
\n<\/span>H5399<\/span><\/a> DOES NOT<\/u> PROTECT ALL UNBORN CHILDREN. DO NOT BE FOOLED BY THE NICE-SOUNDING WORDS <\/span><\/span><\/strong>OF THE UNENFORCEABLE<\/span> LEGISLATIVE FINDINGS. THAT IS A SMOKESCREEN. <\/span>WHAT MATTERS ARE THE <\/strong>ACTUAL PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE SC CODE OF LAWS<\/a>, TITLE 44, CHAPTER 41 – “Abortions<\/a>“.<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

FAKE AND FRAUDULENT “PRO-LIFE” [sic]<\/span> BILL H5399<\/a> PRESERVES “LEGAL” [sic]<\/em> “ABORTION” <\/span>IN THE NEW PROPOSED SECTION 44-41-890.<\/a>, WITH THIS LANGUAGE IN H5399<\/a>:
\n
\n<\/span>[ H5399<\/a> ] “Section 44-41-890. This article must not<\/span> be construed to repeal,<\/span> by implication or otherwise, Sections<\/u><\/span> 44-41-630 through 650, 44-41-20<\/u> <\/span>or any otherwise applicable provision of South Carolina law regulating<\/span> or restricting abortion.”
\n<\/span><\/span><\/b>[ emphasis added ]<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"
\n
\n<\/b><\/span>As the South Carolina State Supreme Court recently explained in its August 17, 2022 Order<\/a> temporarily enjoining the SC Heartbeat Law, <\/span>the SC Legislature in 1974 essentially codified the <\/a>Roe v. Wade <\/em><\/a>“Abortion” framework<\/a>, and that “… the codification of Roe<\/em> in section 44-41-20<\/span> remains part of the public policy of this state, …”.\u00a0 <\/strong>[ emphasis added ]<\/span><\/p>\n

So, just as the Heartbeat Law preserves the Roe v. Wade<\/em> framework<\/span> of SECTION 44-41-20.<\/a> ( which is entitled “Legal” [sic]<\/em> “Abortions.” <\/span>) <\/span><\/strong>of the CURRENT SC CODE OF LAWS<\/a>, SO ALSO DOES THE NOW PROPOSED FAKE, FRAUDULENT H5399<\/a> BILL, FALSELY AND DECEPTIVELY NAMED, <\/span><\/span><\/strong>THE “SOUTH CAROLINA HUMAN LIFE PROTECTION ACT”, continue to preserve the Roe v. Wade<\/em> framework<\/span> in SECTION 44-41-20.<\/a> ( “Legal” [sic]<\/em> “Abortions.” ) <\/span>AS PER THE LANGUAGE IN THE NEW PROPOSED SECTION 44-41-890.<\/a> OF H5399<\/a>.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

So H5399<\/a> explicitly REQUIRES<\/span><\/u><\/span><\/em> in the new proposed Section 44-41-890.<\/a> the PRESERVATION<\/span><\/u> <\/span><\/em>of the SC Legislature’s <\/a><\/span><\/strong>material codification in 1974 of the Roe v.<\/em><\/a> Wade<\/em> “<\/a>Abortion” framework<\/a> which exists TODAY<\/span> in the current SC Code of Laws<\/span><\/a>, <\/span><\/span><\/strong>in Section 44-41-20.<\/a>, which is entitled ‘Legal [sic]<\/em> “Abortions.” ‘.<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

H5399<\/a><\/span> PRESERVES<\/span><\/u><\/em>\u00a0“ABORTION”<\/span> IN THE SC CODE OF LAWS<\/a>\u00a0!<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

H5399<\/span><\/strong><\/a> IS NOT<\/u><\/span> A PRO-LIFE BILL, IT IS A FAKE<\/u><\/span> AND A FRAUD<\/u>\u00a0AND A DECEPTION<\/u>.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

H5399<\/strong><\/span><\/a> DOES NOT<\/u><\/span> ESTABLISH IN LAW PERSONHOOD<\/span> AT FERTILIZATION; AND THEREFORE DOES NOT<\/u><\/span>\u00a0GUARANTEE “DUE PROCESS”<\/span> OR “EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS”<\/span> FOR ANY UNBORN CHILDREN AT FERTILIZATION; AND THEREFORE DOES NOT<\/u><\/span> ESTABLISH JUSTICE.<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/strong>
\nBeing “Pro-Life” means AGREEING WITH GOD<\/span> regarding the Sanctity of Human Life which HE HAS CREATED !<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/strong>
\nThe Creator-God says,<\/span><\/strong>
\n“Thou shalt not kill (murder).<\/span><\/strong>
\nExodus 20:13, KJV<\/a><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>
\nAre the Unborn People ?<\/span><\/strong>
\n
\n<\/span>Are the Unborn “Persons” ?<\/span><\/strong>
\n
\n<\/span>ANYTHING LESS THAN PERSONHOOD<\/span> IS NOT<\/u><\/span> “Equal Justice Under Law”.<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

“Woe unto them that decree unrighteous decrees,…”<\/span><\/strong>
\nIsaiah 10:1, <\/span><\/strong>KJV<\/strong>
\n<\/a>
\n<\/span>H5399<\/span><\/a> is an unrighteous, unjust, iniquitous decree.<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

ESTABLISH JUSTICE.<\/span><\/strong>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>CONTACT YOUR SC HOUSE MEMBER TO SUPPORT AMENDING H5399<\/a>
\nON THE SC HOUSE FLOOR AUGUST 30 WITH THE LANGUAGE OF
\nPERSONHOOD BILL<\/span> H5401<\/a>.
\n<\/span><\/b>(scstatehouse.gov<\/a>)<\/strong>
\n__________________<\/span><\/p>\n

ChristiansforPersonhood<\/span><\/a>.com<\/a><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"[]\"<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Original Posted August 27, 2022; Revised and Edited August 28, 2022 South Carolina Christians Beware ! FAKE “PRO-LIFE” [sic] BILL […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[120,53,119,58,57,5,103],"tags":[121,55,94,71,47,118,60,124,12,14,17,106,18,35,23],"class_list":["post-2546","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-2022-sc-legislature","category-abolitionism","category-establish-justice","category-incrementalism","category-justice","category-personhood","category-sc-governor","tag-2022-sc-legislature","tag-abolish-abortion","tag-abortion-ban","tag-abortion-exceptions","tag-biblical-viewpoint","tag-establish-justice","tag-gods-law","tag-h5401","tag-personhood","tag-roe-v-wade","tag-sc-general-assembly","tag-sc-governor","tag-sc-house-of-representatives","tag-sc-senate","tag-south-carolina"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2546","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2546"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"http:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2546\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2554,"href":"http:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2546\/revisions\/2554"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2546"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2546"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2546"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}