![\"\"](\"http:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/2021-07-25-I-AM-A-PERSON-219x300.png\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Columbia, SC Re: SC Supreme Court Hearing on Heartbeat Law – Oct 19, 2022; Heartbeat Bill vs. Personhood<\/span>: Planned Parenthood<\/span> attorney points out SB1<\/a> (2021 Heartbeat Bill) “does not treat a six-week embryo as another person.”<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n Planned Parenthood attorney points out SB1<\/a> (2021 Heartbeat Bill) “does not treat a six-week embryo as another person. If it did of course, you wouldn’t have a rape exception. After birth a woman cannot kill her child because she had been raped. So SB1 itself distinguishes between a six-week embryo and a person”, near the end of the SC Supreme Court Hearing on whether the incremental six-week Heartbeat Law violates the SC Constitution Privacy Right in Article I, Section 10<\/a>.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n ( Begin at 2:46:00 in video of Oct 19, 2022 SC Supreme Court Hearing – https:\/\/youtu.be\/Jv-6aqO2SnY<\/b><\/a> )<\/span><\/p>\n Even the proponents of “abortion” understand if preborn human beings are recognized as legal “persons”, they cannot be killed !\u00a0 The right to life of “persons” is constitutionally protected.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n KEY LEGAL POINT: PERSONHOOD<\/span> AND THE SC CONSTITUTION RIGHT TO LIFE IN ARTICLE I, SECTION 3.<\/a> TRUMPS PRIVACY. The SC State Constitution states in Article I, Section 3.<\/a> “nor shall any person be deprived of life, … without due process of law, nor shall any person be denied the equal protection of the laws.”<\/span><\/strong> ChristiansforPersonhood<\/span><\/a>.<\/span><\/strong>com<\/span><\/strong> <\/p>\n Columbia, SC Oct 19, 2022 \/ Revised Oct 20, 2022 \/ Revised Oct 21, 2022 Re: SC Supreme Court Hearing […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[120,53,119,125,58,57,5,103],"tags":[121,55,94,71,47,118,60,12,14,17,106,18,35,23],"class_list":["post-2834","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-2022-sc-legislature","category-abolitionism","category-establish-justice","category-gods-law","category-incrementalism","category-justice","category-personhood","category-sc-governor","tag-2022-sc-legislature","tag-abolish-abortion","tag-abortion-ban","tag-abortion-exceptions","tag-biblical-viewpoint","tag-establish-justice","tag-gods-law","tag-personhood","tag-roe-v-wade","tag-sc-general-assembly","tag-sc-governor","tag-sc-house-of-representatives","tag-sc-senate","tag-south-carolina"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2834","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2834"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"http:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2834\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2851,"href":"http:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2834\/revisions\/2851"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2834"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2834"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2834"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nOct 19, 2022 \/ Revised Oct 20, 2022 \/ Revised Oct 21, 2022<\/span><\/p>\n
\n<\/span><\/b>______________________________________________________________
\n
\n<\/span>‘South Carolina Supreme Court takes up state’s abortion ban’
\n<\/span><\/b>ABC News
\nOct 19, 2022
\nhttps:\/\/abcnews.go.com\/Health\/wireStory\/south-carolina-supreme-court-takes-states-abortion-ban-91733940<\/span><\/a><\/strong>
\n_____________________________________________________________________
\n
\n<\/span>Christians for Personhood:<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n
\n
\n<\/span>Regardless of what the SC Supreme Court decides in the Heartbeat Law case, but ESPECIALLY if these justices opine that child-murder is somehow included in the State Constitution Privacy Right, if the SC State Legislature will recognize statutorily the PERSONHOOD<\/span> of preborn human beings beginning at fertilization, without exception, then the right to life of the preborn will be protected constitutionally by Article I, Section 3.<\/a> of the SC State Constitution.
\n<\/span><\/b>
\n<\/span>Personhood<\/span> and the Constitutionally-protected Right to Life trumps Privacy.
\n<\/span><\/b>____________________________________________________________
\n
\n<\/span>‘ROE v. WADE<\/em> Opinion, January 22, 1973: “If … personhood is established, the [pro-“abortion”] case, of course, collapses, …” ‘
\n<\/span><\/b>January 5, 2022
\nhttp:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/2022\/01\/05\/roe-v-wade-opinion-january-22-1973-if-personhood-is-established-the-pro-abortion-case-of-course-collapses
\n<\/span><\/a><\/b><\/span>____________________________________________________________
\n
\n<\/span>God says,
\n“Thou shalt not kill (murder).”
\nExodus 20:13, KJV<\/a><\/b><\/p>\n
\n<\/a>Columbia, SC<\/span><\/p>\n![\"\"](\"http:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/Person-Bible-affirms-20220808-300x221.jpg\")
<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"