![\"\"](\"http:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/2022-Budget-Sec-108-Amdt-6-and-vote.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
SC House Journal <\/p>\n **<\/span><\/strong> Note<\/u>: This Amendment #6 would have only banned the funding of “abortions” in cases of rape and incest. It would not have banned funding of “abortions” in the so-called cases of the life of the mother. However it is never necessary to “abort” (i.e., intentionally kill) the preborn child to save the life of the mother. Premature delivery is not an “abortion”. It is never justified to intentionally take the life of an innocent person. That is Murder. God says, “Thou shalt not kill (murder).” Exodus 20:13, KJV. The preborn child in the womb is judicially innocent. See additional information on “Exceptions” and specifically the so-called “life of the mother” case, at the end of this post below***<\/strong><\/span>. South Carolina Legislature SC House Journal Rep. MAGNUSON proposed the following Amendment No. 6 (Doc Name h:\\legwork\\house\\amend\\h-wm\\005\\delete abortion exceptions.docx), which was tabled: _____________________________________________ Rep. MAGNUSON explained the amendment. “Remember, these are human beings. This is a life, this is a person, that is created in the image of God.”<\/span> \u00a0<\/strong>Rep. Josiah Magnuson (video time 6:31:35)<\/p>\n Rep. SIMRILL spoke against<\/span> the amendment.\u00a0 <\/b>[ Note: Rep. Simrill (R-York) is the present SC House “Republican” [sic]<\/em> Majority Leader, but is not running for re-election in 2022 ] SPEAKER IN CHAIR<\/b><\/p>\n Rep. SIMRILL continued speaking.<\/strong><\/p>\n Rep. SIMRILL moved to table<\/span> the amendment.<\/strong><\/p>\n Rep. MAGNUSON demanded the yeas and nays, which were not ordered.<\/strong><\/p>\n The amendment was then tabled by a division vote of 88 to 22.<\/strong> <\/p>\n This is documented in the 2019 GAO Report below, reporting that South Dakota had not paid for Medicaid rape and incest “abortions” since 1994 (for 25 years); see page15:<\/p>\n US Government Accountability Office There are No “Exceptions”<\/a> to a Ban on Murder.<\/strong> \u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n Pro-Life Without Exception <\/p>\n Dr. Patrick Johnston, Director, Assn. of Pro-Life Physicians, Statement S.457 Senate Judiciary Subcomm. Hearing \u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n Life of the Mother “Exception” by American Right to Life \u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n
\nMarch 14, 2022
\n<\/b>https:\/\/scstatehouse.gov\/sess124_2021-2022\/hj22\/20220314.htm<\/a>
\n[ To find 88 Y – 22 N Division (not Roll Call) Vote, search: “88 to 22” ]
\n________________________________________________
\n
\n<\/span>[ Video<\/a> ]
\nMarch 14 – Near Super-Majority “Republican” [sic] SC House<\/a> votes 88 Y – 22 N<\/a> (Division, not Roll Call) to table (kill) <\/span>Budget Amendment offered to stop<\/u> FUNDING THE MURDER OF PREBORN CHILDREN CONCEIVED IN CASES OF RAPE OR INCEST <\/span>with the South Carolina State “Health” Insurance Plan.
\n
\n<\/span>Fake “Pro-Life” [sic] SC House defeated<\/span> Budget Amendment #6 offered to Part 1B, Section 108<\/a>, the Public Employee Benefit Authority (PEBA), to stop taxpayer dollars from being used to kill certain**<\/span> preborn children through the SC State “Health” Insurance Plan.
\n
\n<\/span>So March 14, 2022, by a vote of 88 Y – 22 N<\/a> (Division, not Roll Call), the Near Super-Majority “Republican” [sic] SC House effectively voted to continue<\/u> FUNDING THE MURDER OF PREBORN CHILDREN CONCEIVED IN CASES OF RAPE OR INCEST <\/span>with the South Carolina State “Health” Insurance Plan.<\/b><\/p>\n
\n_________________________________________________<\/p>\n
\nVideo Archives by meeting time
\n<\/b>https:\/\/scstatehouse.gov\/video\/archives.php
\n<\/a><\/span>Monday, March 14, 2022\u00a0 1:00 pm
\nHouse of Representatives
\nBegin 6:30:15<\/p>\n
\nMarch 14, 2022
\n<\/b>https:\/\/scstatehouse.gov\/sess124_2021-2022\/hj22\/20220314.htm
\n<\/a>[ To find 88 Y – 22 N Division (not Roll Call) Vote, search: “88 to 22” ]
\n
\n<\/span>March 14 – SC House Tables (Kills)<\/span> Magnuson Amendment #6 to Section 108, Part 1B, 88 <\/a>Y – 22 N<\/a> (Division, not Roll Call)
\n<\/a>[ 72 Yea Votes: 33 “Republicans”, 39 Democrats; 37 Nay Votes: 37 Republicans ]
\n_____________________________________________
\n
\n<\/span>Text of Budget Amendment #6 offered to Section 108, Part 1B<\/a> as printed in SC House Journal, March 14, 2022,
\nintroduced by Rep. Josiah Magnuson:<\/b><\/p>\n
\nAmend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 108, PUBLIC EMPLOYEE BENEFIT AUTHORITY, page 473, paragraph 108.4, line 11, by striking:\/of rape, incest or\/
\n<\/b>Renumber sections to conform.
\nAmend totals and titles to conform.<\/p>\n
\n
\n<\/span>South Carolina Legislature
\nVideo Archives by meeting time
\n<\/b>https:\/\/scstatehouse.gov\/video\/archives.php
\n<\/a><\/span>Monday, March 14, 2022\u00a0 1:00 pm
\nHouse of Representatives<\/p>\n
\n<\/b>(Begin video time 6:30:15)<\/p>\n
\n(Begin video time 6:33:25)<\/p>\n
\n_______________________________________________
\n
\n<\/span>Rep. Magnuson informed the SC House members from the podium (video time 6:32:55<\/a>) South Dakota had not paid for “abortion” in the cases of rape and incest, and had not lost Medicaid funding.<\/b><\/p>\n
\nMEDICAID
\nCMS Action Needed to Ensure Compliance with Abortion Coverage Requirements
\nGAO-19-159
\n<\/b>January 2019
\nhttps:\/\/www.gao.gov\/assets\/700\/696338.pdf
\n<\/a>
\n<\/span>‘States Flout Abortion Coverage Requirements, Federal Investigators Say’
\n<\/b>New York Times
\n<\/i>February 17, 2019
\nhttps:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2019\/02\/17\/us\/politics\/states-abortion-coverage-medicaid.html
\n<\/a>
\n<\/span>‘South Dakota hasn’t provided required Medicaid coverage for some abortions for 25 years’
\n<\/b>Argus Leader
\n<\/i>February 20, 2019\/Updated February 21, 2019
\nhttps:\/\/www.argusleader.com\/story\/news\/politics\/2019\/02\/20\/report-south-dakota-violating-federal-medicaid-abortion-law\/2928240002\/
\n<\/a>_____________________________________________
\n_____________________________________________
\n
\n<\/span>***<\/span> “Exceptions” to Ban on “Abortions”:\u00a0 NONE<\/u> !!!<\/span><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n
\n
\n<\/span>No Exceptions<\/strong>
\nhttp:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/no-exceptions\/<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n
\n<\/b>https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=zwazODlTOBk&feature=youtu.be<\/a>
\n<\/span>Is abortion helpful in cases of rape or incest? What about fetal deformity?
\nWhat about threats to the life or health of the mother? Hear the stories
\nof those who have actually been involved in these difficult circumstances.<\/p>\n
\n<\/a><\/b>March 13, 2014
\n[ Written statement of Dr. Patrick Johnston introduced during testimony by Dr. Henry Jordan before SC Senate Judiciary Subcommittee at public hearing on SC Personhood Bill S.457<\/a> on March 13, 2014 ]<\/p>\n
\n<\/b>http:\/\/americanrtl.org\/life-of-the-mother-exception<\/a><\/p>\n