{"id":655,"date":"2019-08-29T20:25:36","date_gmt":"2019-08-30T01:25:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/?p=655"},"modified":"2019-08-29T20:41:46","modified_gmt":"2019-08-30T01:41:46","slug":"sc-abortion-abortionist-funding","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/2019\/08\/29\/sc-abortion-abortionist-funding\/","title":{"rendered":"SC Abortion\/Abortionist Funding"},"content":{"rendered":"

Columbia<\/a> Christians for Life<\/a> ( CCL<\/a> )
\naka Christians for Life and Liberty ( CLL )
\nColumbia, South Carolina
\nAugust 28, 2019
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>SC ‘Abortion’<\/u> \/ ‘Abortionist’ Funding<\/u>:
\n<\/b><\/span>
\n<\/span>May 28
\nOffice of the Governor<\/a>
\nSC State House
\nColumbia, SC
\n<\/b><\/span>
\n<\/span>SC Governor<\/a> Henry McMaster’s Budget Vetoes<\/a> Did <\/span>Not<\/u><\/i><\/span> Cure <\/span>either the <\/span>‘Abortion’<\/span> Funding<\/u><\/span> ( PEBA Proviso 108.4<\/a> ), or<\/u> the <\/span>‘Abortionist’ \/ Planned Parenthood<\/span> Funding<\/u><\/span> ( DHHS Proviso 33.25<\/a> ), <\/span>in the H.4000<\/a> FY 2019-2020 SC State Budget as Passed and Ratified <\/span>by the <\/span>Fake ‘Pro-Life’ [sic]<\/i><\/span> Republican-Super-Majority SC HOUSE <\/a><\/span>and the <\/span>Fake ‘Pro-Life’ [sic]<\/i><\/span> Republican-Majority SC SENATE<\/a>; in fact <\/u><\/span>Governor McMaster’s own proposed Executive Budget<\/a> also contained <\/span>‘Abortion’<\/span> Funding<\/u><\/span> ( PEBA Proviso 108.4<\/a> )
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>________________________
\n________________________<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

Note<\/u>: The Conference Committee Report for H4000<\/a> State Budget was adopted in the SC House by a vote of 105 – 6<\/a> and in the SC Senate by a vote of 32 – 8<\/a>, both votes occurring Tuesday, May 21, 2019.
\n_____________________________________
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>Fake ‘Pro-Life’ [sic]<\/i><\/span> Republican-Majority SC SENATE<\/a>:
\n<\/span>
\nSenate Roll Call Vote Number 442
\nSession: 123 (2019-2020)
\n05\/21\/2019 01:27 pm
\n
\n<\/b><\/span>to adopt the conference report<\/b>
\nRESULT: Passed<\/b><\/span>
\nAyes: 32; Nays: 8; Excused Absence: 4
\n<\/b>
\n<\/span>H 4000 Appropriations Bill, 2019-2020
\nhttps:\/\/www.scstatehouse.gov\/votehistory.php?KEY=16879<\/a>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>Of the 46 Senators ( 27 R, 19 D ) in the SC Senate<\/a>, 32 Senators ( 18 R, 14 D ) voted “Aye” on their final vote May 21 on the FY 2019-2020 SC State Budget<\/b><\/span> funding “Abortion”<\/span> and
\n<\/span>“Abortionist”\/Planned Parenthood.\u00a0 <\/span><\/b>The only eight<\/u><\/b> Senators ( all Republicans ) who voted “Nay” against the SC State Budget which funds Child-Murder and Child-Murderers were:
\n<\/span>
\n<\/b><\/span>Cash, Richard
\nClimer, Wes
\nCorbin, Thomas
\nGrooms, Larry
\nHembree, Greg
\nMassey, Shane
\nRice, Rex
\nSenn, Sandy
\n<\/span><\/b>
\n<\/span>SC Senate Journal – May 21, 2019
\nH. 4000–REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE OF CONFERENCE ADOPTED<\/b>
\nhttps:\/\/www.scstatehouse.gov\/sess123_2019-2020\/sj19\/20190521.htm<\/a>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>___________________________________
\n<\/b><\/span>
\n<\/span>Fake ‘Pro-Life’ [sic]<\/i><\/b><\/span> Republican-Super-Majority SC HOUSE<\/a>
\n<\/span><\/b>
\nHouse Roll Call Vote Number 703
\n<\/b>Session: 123 (2019-2020)
\n05\/21\/2019 02:32 pm
\n
\n<\/b><\/span>Adopt Conference Report<\/b>
\nRESULT: Passed
\n<\/b><\/span>Yeas: 105; Nays: 6; Excused Absence: 7; Not Voting: 4
\n<\/b>
\n<\/span>H 4000 Appropriations Bill, 2019-2020
\nhttps:\/\/www.scstatehouse.gov\/votehistory.php?KEY=16889<\/a>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>Of the 124 House seats [ minus vacancies ] in the SC HOUSE<\/a>, 105 House Representatives ( 66 R, 39 D ) voted “Aye” on their final vote May 21 on the FY 2019-2020 SC State Budget<\/b><\/span> funding “Abortion”<\/span> and <\/span>“Abortionist”\/Planned Parenthood.
\n<\/span><\/b>The only six<\/u><\/b> House Representatives ( all Republicans ) who voted “Nay” against the SC State Budget which funds Child-Murder and Child-Murderers were:
\n<\/span>
\n<\/b><\/span>Hill, Jonathon
\nJones, Stewart
\nLong, Steven
\nMace, Nancy
\nMagnuson, Josiah
\nTrantham, Ashley
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>SC House Journal – May 21, 2019
\nH. 4000–RULE 5.14 WAIVED AND CONFERENCE REPORT ADOPTED<\/b>
\nhttps:\/\/www.scstatehouse.gov\/sess123_2019-2020\/hj19\/20190521.htm<\/a>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/b><\/span>______________________
\n______________________<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

SC Governor McMaster’s Budget Veto Message
\nH. 4000 FY 2019-2020 Budget Vetoes (PDF)<\/a>
\nMay 28, 2019
\n___________________________
\n
\n<\/span>H.4000<\/a> FY 2019-2020 SC State Budget
\n<\/b>
\n<\/span>H.4000<\/a> – As Ratified by the General Assembly on May 22, 2019. Governor’s vetoes are marked. Enacted on June 25, 2019.<\/b><\/p>\n

PART IB PROVISOS
\n( Sections listed separately<\/a>)
\n*** Section 33 (DHHS) Provisos<\/b><\/a> <\/b><\/span>[ ‘Abortionist’ \/ Planned Parenthood<\/span> Funding<\/u><\/span> ( Proviso 33.25<\/a> ) ]
\n<\/b>*** Section 108 (PEBA) Provisos<\/a> <\/b><\/span>[ ‘Abortion’<\/span> Funding<\/u><\/span> ( Proviso 108.4<\/a> ) ]
\n<\/b>( PDF<\/a> format for Part IB )<\/p>\n

H. 4000 — Governor’s Veto Message<\/a> – May 28, 2019<\/b><\/p>\n

H. 4000<\/a> – Conference Report Adopted by the General Assembly on May 21, 2019
\n
\n<\/span>_________________________
\n_________________________
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>May 21 Columbia, SC
\nSC State House<\/p>\n

Republican-Super-Majority SC HOUSE<\/a> and Republican-Majority SC SENATE <\/a>approve SC State Budget<\/a> Conf<\/a> Comm<\/a> Rpt<\/a> with Baby-Killing ( Proviso 108.4<\/a>) and Baby-Killer\/Planned Parenthood ( Proviso 33.25<\/a>) FUNDING; Bill now goes to SC Gov McMaster
\nhttp:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/2019\/08\/20\/647\/<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"
\nliving unborn baby at eight weeks
\n<\/b>http:\/\/clinicquotes.com\/abortion-at-8-weeks-pictures\/<\/a>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>Note<\/u>: The Conference Committee Report for H4000<\/a> State Budget was adopted in the SC House by a vote of 105 – 6 <\/a>and in the SC Senate by a vote of 32 – 8<\/a>, both votes occurring Tuesday, May 21, 2019.\u00a0\u00a0 H4000<\/a> was ratified on May 22, 2019, and next was sent to the SC Governor.
\n<\/b><\/span>
\n<\/span>As this May 21<\/a> version of the SC State Budget approved by both the SC House and SC Senate contains funding for genocidal mass murderers <\/span>Planned Parenthood<\/span> (Section 33 – DHHS), and also contains funding for certain <\/span>‘Abortions’<\/span> in the State Health Insurance Plan (Section 108 – PEBA), that means the version of the SC State Budget as passed by the SC Legislature on May 21<\/a> still requires South Carolina taxpayers to fund<\/span> PLANNED PARENTHOOD <\/span>for now<\/a> and to fund certain <\/span>‘Abortions’.\u00a0 If even one<\/u> child in the womb is murdered during FY 2019-2020 ( July 1, 2019 – June 30, 2020 ) using funds appropriated in <\/span>H4000<\/span><\/a> as approved May 21<\/a> by SC House members, and as approved May 21<\/a> by SC Senate members, as well as earlier applicable votes in the legislative process taken in the SC House and the SC Senate, then each and every House and Senate member voting to appropriate such money, or voting against efforts to stop the appropriation of such money, will consequently thereby be an accessory to murder before-the-fact<\/u>, <\/span>the fraudulent, unrighteous, immoral, and unconstitutional Opinion of the US Supreme Court in Roe v Wade notwithstanding.
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>Note<\/u>: The SC DHHS funding of Planned Parenthood is NOT<\/u> directly for surgical or RU-486 “abortions”, but for so-called “family planning funds”, which may include chemically abortifacient “birth control”. Any government (taxpayer) money given to Planned Parenthood helps sustain their operation as a child-murder center.\u00a0 Two of the three stand-alone child-murder centers remaining in South Carolina are operated by Planned Parenthood [ located in Charleston and Columbia ].
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>_______________________
\n_______________________<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>H.4000<\/a> FY 2019-2020 SC State Budget [ Beginning July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020 ]
\n<\/b>
\n<\/span>SC State Budget signed into Law by SC Governor Henry McMaster includes:<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

‘Abortion’<\/span> Funding<\/u><\/span> ( PEBA Proviso 108.4<\/a> ) and ‘Abortionist’ \/ Planned Parenthood<\/span> Funding<\/u><\/span>
\n( DHHS Proviso 33.25<\/a> ) in the H.4000<\/a> FY 2019-2020 SC State Budget:
\n
\n<\/span>___________________________
\n
\n<\/span>Section 33 (DHHS)<\/a>:\u00a0 <\/span>‘Abortionist’ \/ Planned Parenthood<\/span> Funding<\/u><\/span> ( Proviso 33.25<\/a> )
\n<\/span><\/b>
\n<\/span>SECTION 33 – J020 – DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES<\/b><\/p>\n

[ emphasis, comments below added ]<\/p>\n

33.25.<\/b> \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 (DHHS: Family Planning Funds)\u00a0 The State has enacted Section 43-5-1185 of the 1976 Code that prohibits state funds, directly or indirectly, from being utilized by Planned Parenthood for abortions, abortion services or procedures, or administrative functions related to abortions. Having prevented Planned Parenthood from performing abortions with state funds, once the federal injunction is lifted<\/u> ***, <\/i><\/b><\/span>the Department of Health and Human Services may not direct any federal funds to Planned Parenthood. An otherwise qualified organization may not be disqualified from receipt of these funds because of its affiliation with an organization that provides abortion services, provided that the affiliated organization that provides abortion services is independent of the qualified organization. An independent affiliate that provides abortion services must be separately incorporated from any organization that receives these funds. An organization that provides abortion services in compliance with Part 1.B., Proviso 33.12 of this act is excepted from the above restriction on state family planning funds and may receive state family planning funds.
\n
\n<\/span>*** In other words, DEFUNDING OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD DOES NOT<\/u> GO INTO EFFECT NOW !
\nThat is, for now, funding for Planned Parenthood goes on “business as usual” !!!\u00a0 This is a fake “pro-life” [ sic ] proviso !!!\u00a0 The federal injunction blocking this particular legal \/ legislative strategy to defund Planned Parenthood has been in place since August 2018<\/a> !!!<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

Why did the SC House and SC Senate not adopt the effective proviso<\/a> from the SC Governor’s Proposed Executive Budget [Proviso 33.24<\/a>] which utilized a different legislative strategy <\/u><\/span>to defund Planned Parenthood ?<\/i><\/b><\/p>\n

[ See further below ]
\n
\n<\/i><\/span>_______________________
\n
\n<\/span>Section 108 (PEBA)<\/a>:\u00a0 <\/b><\/span>‘Abortion’<\/span> Funding<\/u><\/span> ( Proviso 108.4<\/a> )
\n<\/span><\/b>
\n<\/span>SECTION 108 – F500 – PUBLIC EMPLOYEE BENEFIT AUTHORITY<\/b><\/p>\n

[ emphasis, comments below added ]<\/p>\n

108.4.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/b>(PEBA: Funding Abortions Prohibited)\u00a0 No funds appropriated for employer contributions to the State Health Insurance Plan may be expended to reimburse the expenses of an abortion, except<\/u><\/i><\/b><\/span> *** <\/b><\/span>in cases of rape, incest or where the mother’s medical condition is one which, on the basis of the physician’s good faith judgment, so complicates the pregnancy as to necessitate an immediate abortion to avert the risk of her death or for which a delay will create serious risk of substantial and irreversible impairment of major bodily function<\/u>,<\/span><\/b> and the State Health Plan may not offer coverage for abortion services, including ancillary services provided contemporaneously with abortion services.\u00a0 The Public Employee Benefit Authority must determine the amount of the total premium paid for health coverage necessary to cover the risks associated with reimbursing participants in the plan for obtaining an abortion in the circumstances covered by this provision.\u00a0 The determination must be based on actuarial data and empirical study in the same manner and by the same method that other risks are adjusted for in similar circumstances.\u00a0 The plan must report this determination annually to the respective Chairmen of the Senate Finance Committee and the House Ways and Means Committee.
\n
\n<\/span>*** In other words, THE TAX-FUNDED MURDER OF CERTAIN CHILDREN IN THE WOMB IS STILL<\/u> <\/i>AUTHORIZED IN THE SOUTH CAROLINA STATE BUDGET !!!
\n<\/b><\/span>
\n<\/span>This is in the SC State Budget passed and ratified and sent to the SC Governor by the Fake ‘Pro-Life’ [sic]<\/i><\/span> Republican-Super-Majority SC HOUSE<\/a> and the Fake ‘Pro-Life’ [sic] <\/i><\/span>Republican-Majority SC SENATE<\/a> !!!
\n<\/b>
\n<\/span>_______________________________<\/p>\n

PERSONHOOD ACT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AND SCRIPTURAL BASIS OF HUMAN LAWS
\n<\/b>http:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/2019\/01\/01\/personhood-act-of-south-carolina-and-scriptural-basis-of-human-laws\/<\/a>
\nDecember 31, 2018\/Revised January 2, 2019<\/span><\/p>\n

Personhood <\/a>Report<\/a>: In Law, No Exceptions to Human <\/a>Personhood
\n<\/a><\/b>November 30, 2018 \/ Edited December 4, 2018
\nhttp:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/2018\/12\/04\/in-law-no-exceptions-to-human-personhood\/<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

Personhood<\/a> Report<\/a>: No Exceptions to Personhood<\/a>
\n<\/b>January 27, 2018
\nhttp:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/2018\/01\/29\/personhood-report-no-exceptions-to-personhood\/<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n


\n<\/span>_________________
\n_________________<\/b><\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>Re: Executive Budget Proposed by SC Governor Henry McMaster, January 14, 2019<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

Section 33 ( DHHS )<\/u><\/p>\n

Where was the vigorous, public debate over adopting the effective language to defund Planned Parenthood in Section 33 (DHHS) contained in the
\nSC Governor’s January 19, 2019 Proposed Executive Budget, in Proviso 33.24 <\/a>of that Document ?<\/i><\/p>\n

Why did the SC House and SC Senate not adopt the effective proviso<\/a> from the SC Governor’s Proposed Executive Budget [ Proviso 33.24<\/a> ] which utilized a different legislative strategy <\/u><\/span>to defund Planned Parenthood ?
\n____________________<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n

SC Governor McMaster’s Proposed Budget for FY 2019-2020<\/p>\n

Governor McMaster’s Executive Budget<\/a> Fiscal Year 2019-2020 (PDF)
\nPart IA<\/a>, Appropriations (PDF)
\nStatement of Revenues<\/a> (PDF)
\nPart IB<\/a> (PDF)<\/p>\n

SC Governor
\nExecutive Budget
\nState of South Carolina
\nFiscal Year 2019-20
\n<\/b>https:\/\/www.scstatehouse.gov\/sess123_2019-2020\/appropriations2019\/gbud1920.pdf<\/a>
\n<\/span>Governor Henry McMaster
\nJanuary 14, 2019
\n<\/b>
\n<\/span>FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 PROVISOS
\nPART IB
\nOPERATION OF STATE GOVERNMENT
\nPAGE 251
\n<\/b>
\n<\/span>FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 PROVISOS
\nPAGE 322
\nSECTION 33 – J020 – DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
\n<\/b>https:\/\/www.scstatehouse.gov\/sess123_2019-2020\/appropriations2019\/GOVPartIB.pdf<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

33.24. (DHHS: Defunding Planned Parenthood) The Department of Health and Human Services may not accept federal funds for family planning. None of the state funds appropriated for family planning may be expended to directly or indirectly subsidize abortion services or procedures or administrative functions and none of the funds appropriated herein may be paid or granted to an organization that provides abortion services.<\/b><\/span> An otherwise qualified organization may not be disqualified from receipt of these funds because of its affiliation with an organization that provides abortion services, provided that the affiliated organization that provides abortion services is independent of the qualified organization. An independent affiliate the provides abortion services must be separately incorporated from any organization that receives these funds. An organization that provides abortion services where the life of the mother is at risk and the termination of the pregnancy is incidental to the lifesaving intervention is excepted from the above restriction on state family planning funds and may receive state family planning funds, provided that the physician shall act in accordance with the standard of care to preserve both the life of the mother and the life of the pre-born child.
\n<\/u>
\n<\/span>Why did the SC House and SC Senate not adopt this effective proviso<\/a> from the SC Governor’s Proposed Executive Budget [ Proviso 33.24<\/a> ] which utilized a different legislative strategy <\/u><\/span>to defund Planned Parenthood ?<\/i><\/b><\/p>\n

_________________________
\n_________________________
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>Re: Executive Budget Proposed by SC Governor Henry McMaster,
\nJanuary 14, 2019<\/span><\/p>\n

Section 108 ( PEBA )<\/u>
\n
\n<\/u>It is grievous to see that even in the Proposed Executive Budget submitted by SC Governor Henry McMaster, January 14, 2019, as pertains to Section 108 ( PEBA ), the wickedness of tax-funded murder of certain children in the womb was contained in the SC Governor’s own proposed SC State Budget !!!
\n<\/i><\/b><\/span>
\n<\/span>SC Governor McMaster’s Proposed Budget for FY 2019-2020<\/b><\/p>\n

Governor McMaster’s Executive Budget<\/a> Fiscal Year 2019-2020 (PDF)
\nPart IA<\/a>, Appropriations (PDF)
\nStatement of Revenues<\/a> (PDF)
\nPart IB<\/a> (PDF)<\/p>\n

SC Governor
\nExecutive Budget
\nState of South Carolina
\nFiscal Year 2019-20
\n<\/b>https:\/\/www.scstatehouse.gov\/sess123_2019-2020\/appropriations2019\/gbud1920.pdf<\/a>
\n<\/span>Governor Henry McMaster
\nJanuary 14, 2019
\n<\/b>
\n<\/span>FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 PROVISOS
\nPART IB
\nOPERATION OF STATE GOVERNMENT
\nPAGE 251
\n
\n<\/span>FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 PROVISOS
\nPAGE 413
\nSECTION 108 – F500 – PUBLIC EMPLOYEE BENEFIT AUTHORITY
\n<\/b>https:\/\/www.scstatehouse.gov\/sess123_2019-2020\/appropriations2019\/GOVPartIB.pdf<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

108.4. (PEBA: Funding Abortions Prohibited) No funds appropriated for employer contributions to the State Health Insurance Plan may be expended to reimburse the expenses of an abortion, except*** <\/b><\/span>in cases of rape, incest or where the mother\u2019s medical condition is one which, on the basis of the physician\u2019s good faith judgment, so complicates the pregnancy as to necessitate an immediate abortion to avert the risk of her death or for which a delay will create serious risk of substantial and irreversible impairment of major bodily function,<\/span><\/b> and the State Health Plan may not offer coverage for abortion services, including ancillary services provided contemporaneously with abortion services. The Public Employee Benefit Authority must determine the amount of the total premium paid for health coverage necessary to cover the risks associated with reimbursing participants in the plan for obtaining an abortion in the circumstances covered by this provision. The determination must be based on actuarial data and empirical study in the same manner and by the same method that other risks are adjusted for in similar circumstances. The plan must report this determination annually to the respective Chairmen of the Senate Finance Committee and the House Ways and Means Committee.
\n
\n<\/span>*** In other words, THE TAX-FUNDED MURDER OF CERTAIN CHILDREN IN THE WOMB WAS PROPOSED IN THE SC GOVERNOR’S EXECUTIVE BUDGET !!!
\n<\/b><\/span>
\n<\/span>This taxpayer-funding of selected child-murder was in the Proposed Executive Budget submitted by SC Governor Henry McMaster on January 14, 2019 !!!<\/b><\/p>\n

______________________
\n______________________<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>Previous Published Reports Related to “Abortion” and “Abortionist” \/ Planned Parenthood Funding in the FY 2019 – 2020 SC State Budget:<\/p>\n

[ Edited ]<\/p>\n

May 21 Columbia, SC
\nSC State House
\n
\n<\/span>Republican-Super-Majority SC HOUSE<\/a> and Republican-Majority SC SENATE <\/a>approve SC State Budget<\/a> Conf<\/a> Comm<\/a> Rpt<\/a> with Baby-Killing<\/span> ( Proviso 108.4<\/a>) and Baby-Killer\/Planned Parenthood<\/span> ( Proviso 33.25<\/a>) FUNDING; <\/span>Bill now goes to SC Gov McMaster
\n<\/b>http:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/2019\/08\/20\/647\/<\/a><\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>Re: Certain \u2018Abortion\u2019-funding in Section 108, Proviso 108.4 and Funding of Planned Parenthood for now in Section 33, Proviso 33.25
\n<\/b>http:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/2019\/07\/31\/re-certain-abortion-funding-in-section-108-proviso-108-4-and-funding-of-planned-parenthood-for-now-in-section-33-proviso-33-25\/<\/a>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>May 7 Columbia, SC
\n<\/b>
\n<\/span>Republican-Super-Majority SC House<\/a> amends SC Senate April 18 version of SC State Budget ( H4000<\/a>) by first restoring House version passed March 13, including Planned Parenhood Funding<\/span> ( DHHS<\/a>) and \u2018Abortion\u2019 Funding<\/span> ( PEBA<\/a>); Amdt 1A adopted by 110-0 Vote<\/a>
\n<\/b>http:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/2019\/06\/15\/republican-super-majority-sc-house-amends-sc-senate-april-18-version-of-sc-state-budget-h4000-by-first-restoring-house-version-passed-march-13-including-planned-parenhood-funding-dhhs-and-ab\/<\/a>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>April 18 Columbia, SC
\n<\/b>
\n<\/span>SC Senate approves<\/a> State Budget ( H4000<\/a>) with<\/b> Planned Parenthood Funding<\/b><\/span> ( Section 33<\/a> \u2013 DHHS) and with certain \u2018Abortion\u2019 Funding<\/span> ( Section 108<\/a> \u2013 PEBA), by 38-6 Vote<\/a>
\n<\/b>http:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/2019\/05\/06\/sc-senate-approves-state-budget-with-planned-parenthood-and-certain-abortion-funding-by-38-6-vote-april-18-2019\/<\/a>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/b><\/span>April 18 Columbia, SC
\n
\n<\/span>SC Senate approves Section 33 (DHHS) of State Budget ( H4000<\/a>) even though it contains PLANNED PARENTHOOD FUNDING:<\/span><\/b>
\n<\/span>http:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/2019\/04\/25\/sc-senate-approves-section-33-dhhs-of-state-budget-h4000-even-though-it-contains-planned-parenthood-funding\/<\/a>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/b><\/span>April 18 Columbia, SC
\n
\n<\/span>SC Senate continues SC DHHS funding of Planned Parenthood<\/span> for now; adopts still ineffective revised version of ineffective Proviso 33.25, without adopting Governor\u2019s effective Proviso 33.24<\/b>
\nhttp:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/2019\/04\/24\/sc-senate-continues-sc-dhhs-funding-of-planned-parenthood-for-now-adopts-still-ineffective-revised-version-of-ineffective-proviso-33-25-without-adopting-governors-effective-proviso-33-24\/<\/a> <\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>April 18 Columbia, SC
\n<\/b>
\n<\/span>SC Senate approves Section 108 (PEBA) of State Budget (H4000<\/a>) even though it contains State-funding of certain \u201cabortions\u201d in
\nState Health Insurance Plan:
\n<\/b>http:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/2019\/04\/23\/sc-senate-approves-section-108-peba-of-state-budget-h4000-even-though-it-contains-state-funding-of-certain-abortions-in-state-health-insurance-plan\/<\/a>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>(SC) Wed., April 17
\n<\/b>
\n<\/span>Re: SC Senate votes against stopping State-funding of certain \u201cabortions\u201d through SC State Health Insurance Plan (PEBA)
\n<\/b>http:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/2019\/04\/23\/sc-senate-votes-against-stopping-state-funding-of-certain-abortions-through-sc-state-health-insurance-plan-peba\/<\/a>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/b><\/span>(SC) Update: PLANNED PARENTHOOD funding STILL in SC State Budget as full Senate to begin budget debate Wed, April 17<\/b>
\nhttp:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/2019\/04\/16\/planned-parenthood-funding-still-in-sc-state-budget-as-full-senate-to-begin-budget-debate-wed-april-17\/<\/a>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/b><\/span>(SC) Alert: Planned Parenthood Funding in SC State Budget; Full Senate Finance Committee meets beginning Tues., April 2nd
\n<\/b>http:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/2019\/03\/27\/sc-alert-planned-parenthood-funding-in-sc-state-budget-full-senate-finance-committee-meets-beginning-tues-april-2nd\/<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

_______________________
\n_______________________<\/b><\/span><\/b><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Columbia Christians for Life ( CCL ) aka Christians for Life and Liberty ( CLL ) Columbia, South Carolina August […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[84,41],"tags":[86,87],"class_list":["post-655","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-2019-sc-legislature","category-columbia-christians-for-life","tag-2019-state-budget","tag-planned-parenthood-funding"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/655","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=655"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/655\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":658,"href":"https:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/655\/revisions\/658"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=655"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=655"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/christiansforpersonhood.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=655"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}