Category Archives: 2019 SC Legislature

SC House: Personhood Amendment Ruled Non-Germane to Incremental Child-Murder Regulation ‘ Heartbeat’ Bill by Republican Speaker Lucas and Republican Pro Tempore Pope on Point of Order – April 24, 2019

Published by:

Posted May 30, 2019 / Revised May 31, 2019

SC House: Personhood Amendment Ruled Non-Germane to Incremental Child-Murder Regulation HeartbeatBill by Republican Speaker Lucas and Republican Pro Tempore Pope on Point of Order – April 24, 2019

( AUDIO ) Rep. Bamberg (D) Amendment No. 2 ( Personhood Bill ) to H3020 Heartbeat Bill
Wednesday, April 24, 2019
Floor of SC House of Representatives, SC State House, Columbia, SC

[ Video available at SC Legislature Video Archives,
Wednesday, April 24, 2019  10:00 am
House of Representatives — House of Representatives – Part 2
  Begin at Video time 33:40 ]

Republican-Super-Majority SC House adopted Mace rape and incest ‘exceptions’ amendment to incremental Child-Murder Regulation ‘ Heartbeat’ Bill which bans NO ‘abortions’ before heartbeat detected

Published by:

Columbia Christians for Life ( CCL )
aka Christians for Life and Liberty ( CLL )
Columbia, South Carolina
May 16, 2019 / Revised May 17, 2019

 

April 24 Columbia, SC

Republican-Super-Majority SC House adopted Mace rape and incest ‘exceptions’ amendment to incremental Child-Murder Regulation HeartbeatBill which bans NO ‘abortions’ before heartbeat detected

Human Life begins at CONCEPTION NOT HEARTBEAT !!!

Note: The Republican-Super-Majority SC House passed H3020 Heartbeat Bill on Second Reading April 24 with Mace rape and incest “exceptions” amendment, and on Third Reading April 25, and sent bill to SC Senate, where H3020 was assigned to Medical Affairs Committe April 25.
_____________________________________
_____________________________________


living unborn baby at eight weeks
http://clinicquotes.com/abortion-at-8-weeks-pictures/

________________________________
________________________________

“Republicans” who voted against tabling Mace rape and incest “exceptions” amendment to incremental Child-Murder Regulation HeartbeatBill, which already bans NO ‘abortions’ before heartbeat detected:

Bailey, Ballentine, Bannister, Blackwell, Bradley, Chellis, Clary, Clemmons, Cogswell, Collins, W. Cox, Daning, Davis, Felder, Finlay, Hewitt, Hixon, Huggins, Hyde, Kimmons, Lowe, Mace, Martin, McCoy, McGinnis, D. C. Moss, Murphy, B. Newton, W. Newton, Sottile, Spires, Taylor, Wooten  [ 33 “Republicans” total ]

Note: SC House Representatives districts and contact information.

After the attempt to table the Mace rape and incest “exceptions” amendment failed on a 38 – 62 vote, the Mace rape and incest “exceptions” amendment was then adopted on a voice vote.  So of the 62 votes against tabling the Mace rape and incest “exceptions” amendment, 33 of those 62 were the “Republicans” listed above.  In other words, the
Mace rape and incest “exceptions” amendment would have failed without the support of Republicans.

______________________________
______________________________

Mace rape and incest ‘exceptions’ amendment added to unjust incremental Child-Murder Regulation HeartbeatBill; unjust Mace amendment insures children conceived in cases of rape and incest can still be murdered even after heartbeat detected:

Note 1: In addition to being fundamentally flawed as an incremental bill regulating child-murder by allowing the murder of all children in the womb prior to a heartbeat being detected (approx. 6 weeks gestation), the ‘ HeartbeatBill ( H3020) as initially filed also already contained “exceptions” for performing an “abortion” (which this bill euphemistically includes among what it terms “a medical procedure” [ sic – intentional murder of a child in the womb is not “a medical procedure” !!! ] “to prevent the death of the pregnant woman or to prevent a serious risk of the substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function of the pregnant woman.” [ Re: H3020 as pre-filed Dec 18, 2018 – Section 44-41-700. (A) and Section 44-41-710. (A) ]

However, it is never necessary to intentionally destroy the child in the womb.  See written Statement below prepared by Dr. Patrick Johnston, presented to a SC Senate Judiciary Subcommittee by Dr. Henry Jordan, on March 13, 2014:

Dr. Patrick Johnston, Director, Assn. of Pro-Life Physicians, Statement S.457 Senate Judiciary Subcomm. Hearing
March 13, 2014

Note 2:  The Mace amendment adding rape and incest exceptions to the ‘ HeartbeatBill ( H3020) was approved by the full SC House Judiciary Committee [ April 4, 2019 Report ], and later adopted by the full SC House on April 24:

SC House Journal – April 24, 2019
https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess123_2019-2020/hj19/20190424.htm#p61
Excerpts [ edited, emphasis added ]

The Committee on Judiciary proposed the following Amendment No. 1 to H. 3020 ( Word version)
(COUNCIL\VR\3020C001.CC.VR19):
Amend the bill, as and if amended, SECTION 2, by striking Section 44-41-680 in its entirety and inserting:

/   Section 44-41-680.   (A)   Section 44-41-670 does not apply to a physician who performs or induces the abortion if the physician determines according to standard medical practice that a medical emergency exists that prevents compliance with that section or that the pregnancy resulted from rape or incest.

(B)   A physician who performs or induces an abortion on a pregnant woman based on an exception in subsection (A) shall make written notations in the pregnant woman’s medical records of the following:

(1)(a)   the physician’s belief that a medical emergency necessitating the abortion existed; and

(b)   the medical condition of the pregnant woman that assertedly prevented compliance with Section 44-41-670; or

(2)   the physician’s belief that the pregnancy resulted from rape of [ sic – or ] incest.

(C)   For at least seven years from the date the notations are made, the physician shall maintain in the physician’s own records a copy of the notations.   / amend the bill further, as and if amended, SECTION 2, by striking Section 44-41-710 in its entirety and inserting:

/   Section 44-41-710.   (A)   Section 44-41-700 does not apply to a physician who performs a medical procedure that, in reasonable medical judgment, is designed or intended to prevent the death of the pregnant woman or to prevent a serious risk of the substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function of the pregnant woman or is designed or intended to terminate a pregnancy that resulted from rape or incest.

(B)(1)   A physician who performs a medical procedure as described in subsection (A) shall declare, in a written document, that the medical procedure is necessary, in reasonable medical judgment, to:

(a)   prevent the death of the pregnant woman or to prevent a serious risk of the substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function of the pregnant woman; or

(b)   terminate a pregnancy that resulted from rape or incest.

(2)   In the document, the physician shall:

(a)   specify the pregnant woman’s medical condition that the medical procedure is asserted to address and the medical rationale for the physician’s conclusion that the medical procedure is necessary to prevent the death of the pregnant woman or to prevent a serious risk of the substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function of the pregnant woman; or

(b)   specify the medical rational for the physician’s conclusion that the medical procedure is necessary to terminate a pregnancy that resulted from rape or incest.

(C)   A physician who performs a medical procedure as described in subsection (A) shall place the written document required by subsection (B) in the pregnant woman’s medical records. For at least seven years from the date the document is created, the physician shall maintain a copy of the document in the physician’s own records.   /

Renumber sections to conform.
Amend title to conform.

Rep. MACE explained the amendment.

Rep. MCCRAVY spoke against the amendment.
Rep. RIDGEWAY spoke against the amendment.

continued…

Rep. RIDGEWAY continued speaking.

Rep. MAGNUSON spoke against the amendment.
Rep. KING spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. KING spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. RUTHERFORD spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. RUTHERFORD spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. RIDGEWAY spoke against the amendment.
Rep. MACE spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. LONG spoke against the amendment.
Rep. MACK spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. THIGPEN spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. THIGPEN spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. R. WILLIAMS spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. R. WILLIAMS spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. CLEMMONS spoke in favor of the amendment.

continued…

Rep. MCCRAVY moved to table the amendment.

Rep. MACE demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:

Yeas 38; Nays 62

Those who voted in the affirmative (38) are:
[ voting AGAINST ADDING MACE RAPE AND INCEST EXCEPTIONS AMENDMENT ]

Alexander, Allison, Bales, Bennett, Burns, Calhoon, Chumley, B. Cox, Crawford, Elliott, Forrest, Forrester, Gagnon, Gilliam, Hardee, Hayes, Hill, Hiott, Johnson, Long, Lucas, Magnuson, McCravy, Morgan, V. S. Moss, Pope, Ridgeway, Sandifer, Simrill, G. R. Smith, Stringer, Tallon, Thayer, Trantham, West, Whitmire, Willis, Yow

Total–38

Those who voted in the negative (62) are:
[ voting IN FAVOR OF ADDING MACE RAPE AND INCEST EXCEPTIONS AMENDMENT ]

Anderson, Atkinson, Bailey, Ballentine, Bamberg, Bannister, Blackwell, Bradley, Brawley, Chellis, Clary, Clemmons, Clyburn, Cobb-Hunter, Cogswell, Collins, W. Cox, Daning, Davis, Felder, Finlay, Garvin, Gilliard, Govan, Henderson-Myers, Henegan, Hewitt, Hixon, Hosey, Howard, Huggins, Hyde, Jefferson, Kimmons, King, Kirby, Lowe, Mace, Martin, McCoy, McDaniel, McGinnis, Moore, D. C. Moss, Murphy, B. Newton, W. Newton, Norrell, Ott, Parks, Pendarvis, Rivers, Robinson, Rutherford, Simmons, Sottile, Spires, Stavrinakis, Taylor, R. Williams, S. Williams, Wooten

Total–62

So, the House refused to table the amendment.

The question then recurred to the adoption of the amendment.

The amendment was then adopted.

____________________
____________________

Additional reports:

PERSONHOOD ACT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
AND SCRIPTURAL BASIS OF HUMAN LAWS
Christians for Personhood newsletter
Steve Lefemine, Christian pro-life missionary
exec. dir., Christians for Personhood
December 31, 2018

ALL Heartbeat bills have a huge “EXCEPTION”
http://christiansforpersonhood.com/index.php/2019/04/08/all-heartbeat-bills-have-a-huge-exception/
April 5, 2019

Personhood Report: In Law, No Exceptions to Human Personhood
November 30, 2018 / Edited December 4, 2018

Personhood Report: No Exceptions to Personhood
January 27, 2018

No Exceptions
http://christiansforpersonhood.com/index.php/no-exceptions/

Pro-Life Without Exception
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=8&v=zwazODlTOBk
Is abortion helpful in cases of rape or incest? What about fetal deformity? What about threats to the life or health of the mother? Hear the stories of those who have actually been involved in these difficult circumstance.

Dr. Patrick Johnston, Director, Assn. of Pro-Life Physicians, Statement S.457 Senate Judiciary Subcomm. Hearing
March 13, 2014

SC House once again votes to Regulate Child-Murder, passes incremental bill banning most ‘abortions’ after Heartbeat detected (with ‘exceptions’); banning NO ‘abortions’ before – April 24/25, 2019

Published by:

Columbia Christians for Life ( CCL )
aka Christians for Life and Liberty ( CLL )
Columbia, South Carolina
April 28, 2019

April 24/25 Columbia, SC

SC House once again votes to Regulate Child-Murder, passes incremental bill banning most ‘abortions’ after Heartbeat detected (with ‘exceptions’); banning NO ‘abortions’ before.

Note: This Report initially sent out by text on April 26; the SC House passed H3020 Heartbeat Bill on Third reading on April 25, and sent bill to SC Senate, where H3020 was assigned to Medical Affairs Comm.
_________________________
_________________________

[ Edited ]

The SC House passed H3020 by 70-31 vote on 2d Reading:

SC House Journal for Wednesday, 4/24/19
https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess123_2019-2020/hj19/20190424.htm

SC House passed H3020 by 64-22 vote on 3rd Reading:

SC House Journal for Thursday, 4/25/19
https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess123_2019-2020/hj19/20190425.htm

(In SC House, 78 R’s, 44 D’s, 2 vac’s)

The State (Columbia, SC)
‘SC House approves bill to ban most abortions in the state’
https://www.thestate.com/news/politics-government/article229557534.html
April 24, 2019 / Updated April 25, 2019
——————-

Christians for Personhood:

Heartbeat Bill H3020:
“Good” is the Enemy of God’s Best
http://christiansforpersonhood.com/index.php/2019/04/09/heartbeat-bill-h3020-good-is-the-enemy-of-gods-best/
April 8, 2019

ALL Heartbeat bills have a huge “EXCEPTION”
http://christiansforpersonhood.com/index.php/2019/04/08/all-heartbeat-bills-have-a-huge-exception/
April 5, 2019
——————-

Columbia Christians for Life:

( Audio / Transcript / Report )
Heartbeat Bill does not establish justice for all human beings at fertilization’: Christian pro-life missionary testifies against incremental ‘Heartbeat’ Bill at SC House Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing – March 21, 2019
http://christianlifeandliberty.net/2019-03-25-Christian-pro-life-missionary-testifies-against-incremental-Heartbeat-Bill-ConLaws-Subcomm-Hearing-March-21-2019.pdf

Incrementalism in theory
is the PERPETUATION of Child-Murder by “abortion” in practice.

God says,

“Thou shalt not kill (murder).” Exodus 20:13, KJV

Note: No Exceptions.

Columbia Christians for Life

ChristianLifeandLiberty.net

SC Senate approves State Budget with Planned Parenthood and certain ‘Abortion’ Funding, by 38-6 Vote, April 18, 2019

Published by:

Columbia Christians for Life ( CCL )
aka Christians for Life and Liberty ( CLL )
Columbia, South Carolina
May 3, 2019 / Edited May 6, 2019

April 18 Columbia, SC

SC Senate approves State Budget ( H4000) with Planned Parenthood Funding ( Section 33 – DHHS) and with certain ‘Abortion’ Funding ( Section 108 – PEBA), by 38-6 Vote

Note: The SC Senate gave Third Reading approval ( Ayes 38; Nays 6 ) to SC State Budget for FY 2019-2020 on April 18; then H4000 was sent back to SC House.  The present version of the SC State Budget requires South Carolina taxpayers to fund PLANNED PARENTHOOD for now and to fund certain ‘Abortions’.  If even one child in the womb is murdered during FY 2019-2020 ( July 1, 2019 – June 30, 2020 ) using funds appropriated in H4000 as approved by SC Senators in various Roll Call votes on April 17 and April 18, then each and every Senator voting to appropriate such money, or voting against efforts to stop the appropriation of such money, will consequently thereby be an accessory to murder before-the-fact, the fraudulent, unrighteous, immoral, and unconstitutional Opinion of the US Supreme Court in Roe v Wade notwithstanding.

Note: The SC DHHS funding of Planned Parenthood is NOT directly for surgical or RU-486 “abortions”, but for so-called “family planning funds”, which may include chemically abortifacient “birth control”. Any government (taxpayer) money given to Planned Parenthood helps sustain their operation as a child-murder center.  Two of the three stand alone child-murder centers remaining in South Carolina are operated by Planned Parenthood [ located in Charleston and Columbia ].

_____________________
_____________________


SC State FY 2019-2020 Appropriations Bill H 4000

1.  SC Senate ineffective Planned Parenthood defunding Proviso 33.25:
     ( scrolls down to Section 33 DHHS )
( As Passed by the Senate on April 18, 2019 )

Part 1B (Provisos)
Section 33
Proviso 33.25
(DHHS: Family Planning Funds)
https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess123_2019-2020/appropriations2019/spp1b.htm#s33

2.  SC Senate funding of certain ‘Abortions’ Proviso 108.4:
     ( scrolls down to Section 108 PEBA )
( As Passed by the Senate on April 18, 2019 )

Part 1B (Provisos)
Section 108
Proviso 108.4
(PEBA: Funding Abortions Prohibited) [ sic – Funding of CERTAIN ‘Abortions’ Required !!! ]
https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess123_2019-2020/appropriations2019/spp1b.htm#s108

_______________________
_______________________

As reported previously (see the two reports linked below), on April 18, the SC Senate approved Section 33 (DHHS) of the State Budget ( H4000) even though it contains PLANNED PARENTHOOD FUNDING, and the SC Senate also approved Section 108 (PEBA) of the State Budget ( H4000) even though it contains State-funding of certain “abortions” in the State Health Insurance Plan.

SC Senate approves Section 33 (DHHS) of State Budget (H4000) even though it contains PLANNED PARENTHOOD FUNDING:
http://christiansforpersonhood.com/index.php/2019/04/25/sc-senate-approves-section-33-dhhs-of-state-budget-h4000-even-though-it-contains-planned-parenthood-funding/
April 25, 2019

SC Senate approves Section 108 (PEBA) of State Budget (H4000) even though it contains State-funding of certain “abortions” in
State Health Insurance Plan:
http://christiansforpersonhood.com/index.php/2019/04/23/sc-senate-approves-section-108-peba-of-state-budget-h4000-even-though-it-contains-state-funding-of-certain-abortions-in-state-health-insurance-plan/
April 22, 2019

SC Senate Journal for 4/18/2019
https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess123_2019-2020/sj19/20190418.htm
( Search for adoption of “Section 33” and Vote to adopt of Ayes 25; Nays 19 )
( Search for adoption of “Section 108” and Vote to adopt of Ayes 37; Nays 6, Abstain 1 )

____________________________

Then on April 18 also came the final, Third Reading vote by the SC Senate for the entire SC State Budget, Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Appropriations Bill H4000, which was approved by a vote of Ayes 38; Nays 6, as follows:

[ Note: The 46-member SC Senate is comprised of 27 Republicans and 19 Democrats. ]

Ayes 38; Nays 6

AYES (Total – 38)

Republicans (21): Alexander, Bennett, Campbell, Campsen, Corbin, Cromer, Davis, Gambrell, Goldfinch, Gregory, Leatherman, Loftis, Martin, Peeler, Rankin, Senn, Shealy, Talley, Turner, Verdin, Young

Democrats (17): Allen, Fanning, Harpootlian, Jackson, Johnson, Kimpson, Malloy, J. Matthews, M. Matthews, McElveen, McLeod, Nicholson, Reese, Sabb, Scott, Setzler, Sheheen

—–

NAYS (Total – 6)

Republicans (6):
Cash, Climer, Grooms, Hembree, Massey, Rice
—–

[ Note: Not voting – Democrats Hutto and Williams on leave. ]

“The Bill was read the third time, passed and ordered returned to the House of Representatives with amendments.”

Statement by Senator CASH

I voted against the budget because it allows state money to be used by the State Health Insurance Plan to pay for the killing of unborn babies who are conceived as a result of rape or insest.

____________________________

So the SC State FY 2019-2020 Appropriations Bill H4000 was passed on Third Reading by the Republican-majority SC Senate on April 18 even though Section 33 (DHHS) contains PLANNED PARENTHOOD FUNDING, and even though Section 108 (PEBA) contains State-funding of certain “abortions” in the State Health Insurance Plan.

—–

Proverb 6:16,17, KJV
Proverb 8:13a, KJV
Proverb 1:7, KJV
Proverb 9:10, KJV
Proverb 16:6b, KJV

Columbia Christians for Life
ChristianLifeandLiberty .net

___________________
___________________

Previous Reports regarding SC Senate deliberations on SC State FY 2019-2020 Appropriations Bill H4000:

1. Section 33 (DHHS) – PLANNED PARENTHOOD FUNDING

SC Senate approves Section 33 (DHHS) of State Budget (H4000) even though it contains PLANNED PARENTHOOD FUNDING:
http://christiansforpersonhood.com/index.php/2019/04/25/sc-senate-approves-section-33-dhhs-of-state-budget-h4000-even-though-it-contains-planned-parenthood-funding/
April 25, 2019

SC Senate continues SC DHHS funding of Planned Parenthood for now; adopts still ineffective revised version of ineffective Proviso 33.25, without adopting Governor’s effective Proviso 33.24
http://christiansforpersonhood.com/index.php/2019/04/24/sc-senate-continues-sc-dhhs-funding-of-planned-parenthood-for-now-adopts-still-ineffective-revised-version-of-ineffective-proviso-33-25-without-adopting-governors-effective-proviso-33-24/
April 23, 2019

PLANNED PARENTHOOD funding STILL in SC State Budget as full Senate to begin budget debate Wed, April 17
http://christiansforpersonhood.com/index.php/2019/04/16/planned-parenthood-funding-still-in-sc-state-budget-as-full-senate-to-begin-budget-debate-wed-april-17/
April 16, 2019

(SC) Alert: Planned Parenthood Funding in SC State Budget; Full Senate Finance Committee meets beginning Tues., April 2nd
http://christiansforpersonhood.com/index.php/2019/03/27/sc-alert-planned-parenthood-funding-in-sc-state-budget-full-senate-finance-committee-meets-beginning-tues-april-2nd/
March 27, 2019

2.  Section 108 (PEBA) – FUNDING CERTAIN ‘ABORTIONS’

SC Senate approves Section 108 (PEBA) of State Budget (H4000) even though it contains State-funding of certain “abortions” in State Health Insurance Plan:
http://christiansforpersonhood.com/index.php/2019/04/23/sc-senate-approves-section-108-peba-of-state-budget-h4000-even-though-it-contains-state-funding-of-certain-abortions-in-state-health-insurance-plan/
April 22, 2019

SC Senate votes against stopping State-funding of certain “abortions” through SC State Health Insurance Plan (PEBA)
http://christiansforpersonhood.com/index.php/2019/04/23/sc-senate-votes-against-stopping-state-funding-of-certain-abortions-through-sc-state-health-insurance-plan-peba/
April 18, 2019 / Revised April 21, 2019

SC Senate approves Section 33 (DHHS) of State Budget (H4000) even though it contains PLANNED PARENTHOOD FUNDING:

Published by:

Columbia Christians for Life ( CCL )
aka Christians for Life and Liberty ( CLL )
Columbia, South Carolina
April 25, 2019

April 18 Columbia, SC

SC Senate approves Section 33 (DHHS) of State Budget ( H4000) even though it contains PLANNED PARENTHOOD FUNDING:


Note: Prior to April 25 Revision, this Report initially sent out by text on April 24; the SC Senate gave Third Reading approval to SC State Budget for FY 2019-2010 on April 18; H4000 sent back to SC House

Note: This SC DHHS funding of Planned Parenthood is NOT directly for surgical or RU-486 “abortions”, but for so-called “family planning funds”, which may include chemically abortifacient “birth control”. Any government (taxpayer) money given to Planned Parenthood helps sustain their operation as a
child-murder center.  Two of the three stand alone child-murder centers remaining in South Carolina are operated by Planned Parenthood [ located in Charleston and Columbia ].
_______________________
_______________________


[ Revised 4/25/2019 ]

As reported previously (see below), on April 18, the SC Senate adopted revised version of ineffective Proviso 33.25 as proposed in Senator Cash Amdt No. 79, still ineffective insofar as stopping Planned Parenthood funding for now, and so FUNDING FOR PLANNED PARENTHOOD REMAINED IN THE BUDGET (within Section 33).

(Search for “No. 79”):

SC Senate Journal for 4/18/2019
https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess123_2019-2020/sj19/20190418.htm

Previous report:

April 18
Columbia, SC
SC Senate continues SC DHHS funding of Planned Parenthood for now; adopts still ineffective revised version of ineffective Proviso 33.25, without adopting Governor’s effective Proviso 33.24

Then on April 18, when it came time for the SC Senate to start finishing up debate on budget, and final voting on all the complete Sections took place, the SC Senate approved Section 33 (DHHS), PLANNED PARENTHOOD FUNDING and all, as follows:

Ayes 25; Nays 19

AYES (Total – 25)

Republicans (8): Alexander, Campbell, Gambrell, Goldfinch, Gregory, Leatherman, Rankin, Senn

Democrats (17): Allen, Fanning, Harpootlian, Jackson, Johnson, Kimpson, Malloy, J. Matthews, M. Matthews, McElveen, McLeod, Nicholson, Reese, Sabb, Scott, Setzler, Sheheen

NAYS (Total – 19)

Republicans (19): Bennett, Campsen, Cash, Climer, Corbin, Cromer, Davis, Grooms, Hembree, Loftis, Martin, Massey, Peeler, Rice, Shealy, Talley, Turner, Verdin, Young

Section 33 was adopted.

(Search for “Section 33”):

SC Senate Journal for 4/18/2019
https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess123_2019-2020/sj19/20190418.htm

So the ineffective Cash Amdt (No. 79) was adopted April 18, without adopting Governor McMaster’s effective Proviso 33.24; and then the whole of Section 33, WITH THE PLANNED PARENTHOOD FUNDING, was approved April 18, by 25 – 19 vote.

Proverb 16:6b, KJV

Columbia Christians for Life
ChristianLifeandLiberty .net