Category Archives: Establish Justice

March 14: Debate on South Carolina’s Baby-Killer and Baby-Killing Funding State Budget begins in “Republican” Near Super-Majority SC House

Published by:

 

March 14: Debate on South Carolina’s Baby-Killer and Baby-Killing Funding State Budget begins in “Republican” Near Super-Majority SC House

SC House Ways and Means Committee version of H.5150 FY 2022-2023
State Budget Bill
Provisos – Part 1B
https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess124_2021-2022/appropriations2022/wmb22ndx.php
___________________________________

Baby-killing as usual indicated:

1. Section 33 – DHHS

Proviso 33.12 –
Reveals Medicaid funding of fake “pro-life”, pro-“abortion” Hyde Amendment to pay
for “abortions” in cases of rape, incest, so-called life of the mother

 

In spite of 2019 GAO Report that South Dakota had not paid for Medicaid rape and incest “abortions” since 1994 (for 25 years); see page15:

US Government Accountability Office
MEDICAID
CMS Action Needed to Ensure Compliance with Abortion Coverage Requirements
GAO-19-159
January 2019
https://www.gao.gov/assets/700/696338.pdf

‘States Flout Abortion Coverage Requirements, Federal Investigators Say’
New York Times
February 17, 2019
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/17/us/politics/states-abortion-coverage-medicaid.html

‘South Dakota hasn’t provided required Medicaid coverage for some abortions for 25 years’
Argus Leader
February 20, 2019/Updated February 21, 2019
https://www.argusleader.com/story/news/politics/2019/02/20/report-south-dakota-violating-federal-medicaid-abortion-law/2928240002/
___________________________________

2. Section 108 – PEBA

Proviso 108.4 –
Funding for SC State “Health” Insurance Plan to pay for “abortions” for rape, incest, so-called life of the mother cases


___________________________________

South Carolina taxpayer dollars also fund “birth control”, some of which can cause chemical “abortions”.
SC State Budget line items are sufficiently vague so that it would require an FOIA request to actually find out how much is budgeted to pay for baby-killing so-called “birth control” [child-prevention].  Just another way our SC State Government officials evade accountability to the taxpayers and citizens of South Carolina.
___________________________________

3. Then there is the Medicaid funding of mass-murderers PLANNED PARENTHOOD.

Two of the three remaining “abortion” mills in SC (down from 12 in 1988) are Planned Parenthood centers.

Recall that the SC Governor’s Executive Budget has two competing Provisos in Section 33:

SC Governor’s Executive FY 2022-2023
State Budget Bill
Provisos – Part 1B
https://admin.sc.gov/sites/default/files/budget/FY%2022-23%20Proviso%20Text_FINAL.pdf

Proviso 33.25 (PAGE 360) which does nothing now; key words “once the federal injunction is lifted”.  The federal injunction has to do with preventing the Governor from removing Planned Parenthood from the SC State Medicaid program as an authorized provider. The federal court issued an injunction against that.

However, Proviso 33.28 (PAGE 360) is a real attempt to defund Planned Parenthood, now, by instructing SC DHHS not to accept ANY federal funds for “family planning”, which would of course include any such funds for Planned Parenthood.

Proviso 33.25 is an example of “Republican” Leadership fake “pro-life” theater. Proviso 33.28 would get something done, but Proviso 33.28 is not included in the Ways and Means Committee version of the State Budget H.5150.

The fake “pro-life” SC House Ways and Means Committee version of State Budget only has Proviso 33.25, with make-believe defunding language.  “Republicans” especially in Leadership are good at “pro-life” theater.  Watch their deeds, not their fake words. Funding of certain baby-killing and baby-killers continues year after year after year in the SC State Budget !

 

Proverbs 6:16,17, KJV
16 These six things doth the LORD hate; yea, seven are an abomination unto him:
17 a proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood,

__________________________

Steve Lefemine
Christian pro-life, pro-personhood missionary
Columbia, SC

ChristiansforPersonhood.com

 

‘SC State Government’s Own “Abortion” Facility:
Will Near Super-Majority “Republican” SC Legislature Continue to Allow
Taxpayer-Funded Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) to Kill Babies ?’

Christians for Personhood
March 9, 2022
https://christiansforpersonhood.com/index.php/2022/03/09/2-sc-state-governments-own-abortion-facility-will-near-super-majority-republican-sc-legislature-continue-to-allow-taxpayer-funded-medical-university-of-south-carolina-musc-to-kill-babie/

WHAT IS AN “ABORTION” ABOLITION BILL ?

Published by:

             

WHAT IS AN “ABORTION” ABOLITION BILL ?

By definition (and common sense), isn’t an “Abortion” Abolition bill a bill that abolishes ALL “abortion” ?

“Pro-Life” [sic] bills which do not End / Abolish ALL “Abortions” (including surgical, RU-486, and chemical “abortions”) do NOT Establish Biblical Justice, and do NOT provide Equal Protection for ALL unborn children, and therefore, by definition, are NOT “Abortion” Abolition Bills.

At present the only known true “abortion” abolition bills are bills which establish legal Personhood for natural persons at fertilization, in law, without exceptions, such as:

1) NC HB 158

Filed Feb 24, 2021
www.ncleg.gov/BillLookUp/2021/H158

HB 158 Text
https://webservices.ncleg.gov/ViewBillDocument/2021/661/0/DRH40068-MLy-38A

_______________________________________________

2) SC H3568

2021-2022 Bill 3568: Personhood Act of SC
www.scstatehouse.gov/sess124_2021-2022/bills/3568.htm

_______________________________________________

3) SC S381

2021-2022 Bill 381: Personhood Act of SC
www.scstatehouse.gov/sess124_2021-2022/bills/381.htm

_______________________________________________

Chemical “abortions” caused by abortifacient so-called “birth control” [e.g., IUD’s, “birth control” pills] are reliably estimated to be SEVERAL TIMES MORE IN NUMBER PER YEAR IN THE UNITED STATES THAN THE COMBINED TOTAL OF SURGICAL AND RU-486 “ABORTIONS”.

_______________________________________________

“CHEMICAL ABORTION” [Brochure]
Pastors For Life
Easley, SC
1996
By Richard Cash

http://christianlifeandliberty.net/2021-12-17-CHEMICAL-ABORTION-Pastors-For-Life-Easley-SC-1996.pdf
_________________________________________________

“The Pill” [Brochure]
By Joan Appleton, RN
May 1995

http://christianlifeandliberty.net/2021-04-09-The-Pill-brochure-Joan-Appleton-RN.pdf
_________________________________________________

“THE PILL” [Flyer]
Updated February 2003
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
Office of Public Health and Science,
Office of Population Affairs

http://christianlifeandliberty.net/2021-04-09-THE-PILL-US-Dept-of-Health-and-Human-Services-Updated-Feb-2003.pdf
_________________________________________________
_________________________________________________

Establish Justice !

END Child-Murder by “Abortion” !

PASS PERSONHOOD NOW !

 

“Personhood Act of South Carolina”
( 2021-2022 Session of SC Legislature )

S.381
H.3568
( scstatehouse.gov )

 

God says,

“Thou shalt not kill (murder).”

Exodus 20:13, KJV

 

Steve Lefemine
Christians for Personhood
PO Box 12222
Columbia, SC 29211

ChristiansforPersonhood.com


Non-tax-deductible contributions may be sent to:

Christians for Personhood
PO Box 12222
Columbia, SC 29211

CP@spiritcom.net

_____________________________________
_____________________________________

[]

living unborn [ human ] baby at eight weeks
http://clinicquotes.com/abortion-at-8-weeks-pictures/

__________________________________
__________________________________

‘ROE v. WADE Opinion, January 22, 1973: “If … personhood is established, the [pro-“abortion”] case, of course, collapses, …” ‘

Christians for Personhood
January 5, 2022
http://christiansforpersonhood.com/index.php/2022/01/05/roe-v-wade-opinion-january-22-1973-if-personhood-is-established-the-pro-abortion-case-of-course-collapses/
______________________________________________

‘Audio / ROE v. WADE – FULL SECOND ORAL ARGUMENT BEFORE US SUPREME COURT – October 11, 1972’

Christians for Personhood
November 18, 2021
http://christiansforpersonhood.com/index.php/2021/11/18/audio-roe-v-wade-full-second-oral-argument-before-us-supreme-court-october-11-1972/

______________________________________________

‘History of Personhood Legislation in South Carolina (1998 – 2021)’

Christians for Personhood
November 12, 2021/Revised November 12, 2021/Edited November 14, 2021
http://christiansforpersonhood.com/index.php/2021/11/10/history-of-personhood-legislation-in-south-carolina-1998-2021/

______________________________________________

‘PERSONHOOD and South Carolina Constitutional Law:’

Christians for Personhood
Nov 5, 2021
http://christiansforpersonhood.com/index.php/2021/11/05/personhood-and-south-carolina-constitutional-law/

______________________________________________

‘PERSONHOOD and South Carolina State Law:’

Christians for Personhood
Nov 2, 2021
http://christiansforpersonhood.com/index.php/2021/11/02/personhood-and-south-carolina-state-law

______________________________________________

Videos / PERSONHOOD IS THE KEY TO ENDING “ABORTION” IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’

Christians for Personhood
Oct 25, 2021
http://christiansforpersonhood.com/index.php/2021/10/25/videos-personhood-is-the-key-to-ending-abortion-in-the-united-states-of-america

______________________________________________

“Good” is the Enemy of God’s Best: Personhood vs Incrementalism

Christians for Personhood
Oct 10, 2021
http://christiansforpersonhood.com/index.php/2021/10/10/good-is-the-enemy-of-gods-best-personhood-vs-incrementalism

______________________________________________

ROE v. WADE Opinion, January 22, 1973: “If … personhood is established, the [pro-“abortion”] case, of course, collapses, …”

Published by:

ROE v. WADE Opinion, January 22, 1973:

“If … personhood is established, the [pro-“abortion”] case, of course, collapses, …”

ROE v. WADE Opinion: “If this suggestion of personhood is established, the appellant’s case, of course, collapses, [410 U.S. 113, 157]  for the fetus’ right to life would then be guaranteed specifically by the Amendment.”

____________________________________________
____________________________________________

United States Supreme Court
ROE v. WADE (1973)
No. 70-18

Argued: December 13, 1971

Reargued: October 11, 1972

Decided: January 22, 1973
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/410/113.html

Appellee (Pro-Life): Henry Wade, District Attorney of Dallas County, State of Texas

Appellant (Pro-“Abortion”): Jane Roe (Norma McCorvey*)

[ * Norma McCorvey later became a born-again Christian and a leading voice for the sanctity of life of the unborn, and against “abortion” ]

 

ROE v. WADE Opinion:

Part IX

A. The appellee [ Texas ] and certain amici argue that the fetus is a “person” within the language and meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment.  In support of this, they outline at length and in detail the well-known facts of fetal development. If this suggestion of personhood is established, the appellant’s case, of course, collapses, [410 U.S. 113, 157]  for the fetus’ right to life would then be guaranteed specifically by the Amendment. The appellant [ Jane Roe ] conceded as much on reargument. [FN 51] On the other hand, the appellee conceded on reargument [FN 52] that no case could be cited that holds that a fetus is a person within the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment.  [ emphasis added; identification of parties to the case in brackets added ]

__________________________________________________

PERSONHOOD is the KEY to ENDING/ABOLISHING Child-Murder by “Abortion” in America

US Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart during the Second Oral Argument of Roe v. Wade, on October 11, 1972:

“And the basic constitutional question initially is whether or not an unborn fetus is a person, isn’t it ?”

continued…

“It’s critical to this case, is it not ?”

[ emphasis added ]

__________________________________________________

Audio / ROE v. WADE
FULL SECOND ORAL ARGUMENT BEFORE US SUPREME COURT
– October 11, 1972
http://christiansforpersonhood.com/index.php/2021/11/18/audio-roe-v-wade-full-second-oral-argument-before-us-supreme-court-october-11-1972/

US Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart:

“And the basic constitutional question initially is whether or not an unborn fetus is a person, isn’t it ?”

Texas Asst Attorney General Robert Flowers:

“Yes, and entirely to the constitutional perspective.”

US Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart:

“It’s critical to this case, is it not ?”

Texas Asst Attorney General Robert Flowers:

“Yes, sir, it is, …”

[ emphasis added ]

__________________________________________________

‘PERSONHOOD and South Carolina Constitutional Law:’
http://christiansforpersonhood.com/index.php/2021/11/05/personhood-and-south-carolina-constitutional-law/

“… nor shall any person be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, nor shall any person be denied the equal protection of the laws.”

Constitution of the State of South Carolina, Article I, Section 3.

[ emphasis added ]
_________________

South Carolina Constitution
ARTICLE I
DECLARATION OF RIGHTS

SECTION 3. Privileges and immunities; due process; equal protection of laws.

The privileges and immunities of citizens of this State and of the United States under this Constitution shall not be abridged, nor shall any person be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, nor shall any person be denied the equal protection of the laws. (1970 (56) 2684; 1971 (57) 315.)

https://www.scstatehouse.gov/scconstitution/A01.pdf

[ emphasis added ]

__________________________________________________

‘PERSONHOOD and South Carolina State Law:’
http://christiansforpersonhood.com/index.php/2021/11/02/personhood-and-south-carolina-state-law

“Murder” is the killing of any person

[ emphasis added ]
___________________________

South Carolina Code of Laws
Title 16 – Crimes and Offenses
Chapter 3 – Offenses Against the Person
ARTICLE I – Homicide

SECTION 16-3-10. “Murder” defined.

“Murder” is the killing of any person with malice aforethought, either express or implied.

www.scstatehouse.gov/code/t16c003.php

[ emphasis added ]

__________________________________________________

The word “person” is a legal term of art:

Black’s Law Dictionary (2009): Person = “A Human Being”

__________________________________________________

PERSONHOOD LEGISLATION TO ESTABLISH JUSTICE AND END CHILD-MURDER BY “ABORTION” IN SOUTH CAROLINA WAS FIRST FILED IN THE SC LEGISLATURE NEARLY 24 YEARS AGO IN 1998, AND HAS BEEN ACTIVE EVERY YEAR SINCE:

[ Report ]
2021-2022 SC Personhood Bills, H.3568 and S.381
23 Years of Personhood Legislation in South Carolina
April 26, 2021

History of Personhood Legislation in South Carolina (1998 – 2021)
http://christiansforpersonhood.com/index.php/2021/11/10/history-of-personhood-legislation-in-south-carolina-1998-2021/

PERSONHOOD is the KEY to ENDING/ABOLISHING Child-Murder by “Abortion” in South Carolina

__________________________________________________

Ignore Roe !

Interpose !
( LesserMagistrate.com )

Establish Justice, Now !

END/ABOLISH Child-Murder by “Abortion” Now !

PASS PERSONHOOD NOW !

“Personhood Act of South Carolina”
( 2021-2022 Session of SC Legislature )

S.381
H.3568
(scstatehouse.gov)

 

God says,

“Thou shalt not kill (murder).”

Exodus 20:13, KJV

 

ChristiansforPersonhood.com

 

Non-tax-deductible contributions may be sent to:

Christians for Personhood
PO Box 12222
Columbia, SC 29211

CP@spiritcom.net

Audio / ROE v. WADE – FULL SECOND ORAL ARGUMENT BEFORE US SUPREME COURT – October 11, 1972

Published by:

                                                                  Edited December 27, 2021

Audio

ROE v. WADE – FULL SECOND ORAL ARGUMENT BEFORE US SUPREME COURT

October 11, 1972

PERSONHOOD is the KEY to ENDING Child-Murder by “Abortion” in America
__________
__________

ROE v. WADE

Second Oral Argument
(Oral Reargument)
October 11, 1972

AUDIO and TRANSCRIPT

www.oyez.org/cases/1971/70-18

http://christianlifeandliberty.net/Roe-v-Wade-TRANSCRIPT-Second-Oral-Argument-October-11-1972-Oyez-org.pdf
________

Excerpts:

Go to 50:15

US Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart:

“And the basic constitutional question initially is whether or not an unborn fetus is a person, isn’t it ?”

Texas Asst Attorney General
Robert Flowers:

“Yes, and entirely to the constitutional perspective.”

US Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart:

“It’s critical to this case, is it not ?”

Texas Asst Attorney General
Robert Flowers:

“Yes, sir, it is, …”
________

‘Videos / PERSONHOOD IS THE KEY TO ENDING “ABORTION” IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’

Christians for Personhood
Oct 25, 2021
http://christiansforpersonhood.com/index.php/2021/10/25/videos-personhood-is-the-key-to-ending-abortion-in-the-united-states-of-america
________

History of Personhood Legislation in South Carolina (1998 – 2021)
http://christiansforpersonhood.com/index.php/2021/11/10/history-of-personhood-legislation-in-south-carolina-1998-2021/

 

Establish Justice, Now !  

END Child-Murder by “Abortion” Now !

PASS PERSONHOOD NOW !

“Personhood Act of South Carolina”
( 2021-2022 Session of SC Legislature )

S.381
H.3568
(scstatehouse.gov)

 

God says,

“Thou shalt not kill (murder).”

Exodus 20:13, KJV

 

Christians for Personhood
PO Box 12222
Columbia, SC 29211

CP@spiritcom.net

ChristiansforPersonhood.com