Tag Archives: Dismemberment

2022 SC Legislature Abolitionism Establish Justice Incrementalism Justice Personhood SC Governor

Re: ECTOPIC PREGNANCIES – Unethical versus Ethical Methods of Treatment

Published by:

Revised July 31, 2022

Re: ECTOPIC PREGNANCIES
– Unethical versus Ethical Methods of Treatment
___________________________________________

UNETHICAL:

Use of Abortifacient Drug Methotrexate Kills Ectopic Babies, Causes Ectopic Pregnancy “Abortions”;

Or May Result in Severely Deformed Baby if Misdiagnosis Fails to Detect Embryo Implanted in Uterus

ETHICAL:

“Watchful Waiting/Expectant Management” and If Needed, Ethically Performed Surgery **
______________________________________________

** Salpingectomy not salpingostomy ( whether by laparoscopic (keyhole) surgery or by laparotomy )
______________________________________________

ABC News
‘Baby Born Deformed After Misdiagnosed Ectopic Pregnancy’
Jan 23, 2012
https://abcnews.go.com/Health/w_ParentingResource/baby-born-deformeind-misdiagnosed-ectopic-pregnancy/story?id=15421441

                                       

___________________________________________

‘Presumed diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy’
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Sep 2002
 PubMed
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12220770/

“Conclusion: In an effort to save time, avoid dilation and curettage (D&C), and
treat with methotrexate, the presence of an ectopic pregnancy is often presumed.
The presumed diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy is inaccurate in almost 40% of cases. …”
[ Emphasis added ]
__________________________________________________



 

‘Outcome following high-dose methotrexate in pregnancies misdiagnosed as ectopic’
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Dec 2011
PubMed
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21907957/

“Results: … All pregnancies resulted in catastrophic outcomes.”  [ Emphasis added ]

 

____________________________________________________

Supposedly “pro-life” bills/laws which permit use of the abortifacient drug methotrexate
to “treat” ectopic pregnancies are pieces of legislation with a serious, unacceptable flaw.

Intentional killing of a pre-birth human being, wherever that human being is located, whether in the uterus, a fallopian tube, or elsewhere (not all ectopic pregnancies are located in the fallopian tube) is unethical, unjust, and unbiblical.

So then use of the abortifacient drug methotrexate to kill the tubal ectopic zygote/embryo is a methotrexate “abortion”, and is therefore unethical, unjust, and unbiblical.
___________________________________________

 

‘Expectant management of ectopic pregnancy’
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Sep 1992
PubMed
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1386659/

 

___________________________________________

God says,
“Thou shalt not kill (murder).”
 Exodus 20:13, KJV

Establish Justice.

Are Unborn Human Beings People ? Are the Unborn Persons ? ALL of them ?

If the Unborn are not Persons, then they have neither Constitutional Rights of Due Process nor of Equal Protection for their Right to Life, as do other People.

Pass Personhood Now, with No Exceptions.
There are No Exceptions to Creator God-given, inherent, unalienable, natural Personhood.

H5401, S1335
(scstatehouse.gov)

Christians for Personhood
Columbia, SC

ChristiansforPersonhood.com

2018 SC Legislature Personhood Report

SC Senate ‘Abortion’ Bills battle, May 1 – 4 – Report #3B

Published by:

Christians for Personhood ( CP )
Columbia, South Carolina
May 16, 2018

SC Senate ‘Abortion’ Bills battle, May 1 – 4 – Report #3B:
_______________________________________
_______________________________________

[ Report to be sent by text also ]

SC Senate ‘Abortion’ Bills battle, May 1 – 4 – Report #3B:

Personhood Bill S217 vs Hutto “Hyde-Amdt”-type fake “pro-life” replacement amdt to H3548 vs SCCL’s euthanasia Dismemberment Bill H3548

/// On Tues, May 1, with the pro-euthanasia H3548 Dismemberment Bill before the Senate on Special Order, Senator Cash’s Amdt No. 11 proposing to add all language contained in Personhood Bill S217; to all text of Dismemberment Bill H3548; plus one additional sentence proscribing dismemberment of baby in case of providing medical treatment to prevent death of pregnant woman, was tabled on Roll Call vote of 30 Y – 11 N on Senator Hutto’s Motion to Table.

/// See Senate Journal for 5/1/2018 – https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess122_2017-2018/sj18/20180501.htm

/// As previously reported, voting No against tabling Amdt No. 11 were 11 Republicans: Alexander, Cash, Climer, Corbin, Cromer, Gambrell, Goldfinch, Martin, Rice, Timmons, Verdin

/// As a matter of record, EIGHT of these 11 also voted on February 6, 2018 to RECALL S217 Personhood Bill from Senate Judiciary Committee, where S217 was being “slow-walked” (obstructed, delayed) by Personhood opponent, Chairman Senator Luke Rankin (RINO-Horry). Senator Martin’s Recall Motion failed on a 10 Y – 34 N Roll Call vote

/// See Senate Journal for 2/6/2018 – https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess122_2017-2018/sj18/20180206.htm

/// The EIGHT who voted for both Cash Amdt No. 11 on May 2, AND voted for Senator Martin Recall Motion on Feb 6, 2018 are: Alexander, Cash, Corbin, Cromer, Gambrell, Martin, Rice, Timmons

/// Verdin was on leave Feb 6. Freshman Senators Climer and Goldfinch did not vote for Feb 6 Recall, however they are considered strong supporters of Personhood Bill. So these 11 together are considered strongest supporters of Personhood legislation among 27-seated member Republican Senate Caucus

/// Senators Davis and Peeler also voted for Martin Recall Motion Feb 6, however neither voted for Cash Amdt No. 11 on May 1 ///

[ End ]

2018 SC Legislature Personhood Report

SC Senate ‘Abortion’ Bills battle, May 1 – 4 – Report #3A:

Published by:

Christians for Personhood ( CP )
Columbia, South Carolina
May 13, 2018

SC Senate ‘Abortion’ Bills battle, May 1 – 4 – Report #3A:
_______________________________
_______________________________

[ Report to be sent by text also ]

SC Senate ‘Abortion’ Bills battle, May 1 – 4 – Report #3A:

Personhood Bill S217 vs Hutto “Hyde-Amdt”-type fake “pro-life” replacement amdt to H3548 vs SCCL’s euthanasia Dismemberment Bill H3548

/// On Tues, May 1, with the pro-euthanasia H3548 Dismemberment Bill before the Senate on Special Order, the vote to table Senator Cash’s Amdt No. 11 occurred about 6:45pm.  Amdt No. 11 proposed to add all language contained in Personhood Bill S217; to all text of Dismemberment Bill H3548, plus one additional sentence proscribing dismemberment of baby in case of providing medical treatment to prevent death of pregnant woman

/// The Roll Call vote to Table was 30 Y – 11 N, and so Amdt No. 11 was tabled (killed). See Senate Journal for 5/1/2018 – https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess122_2017-2018/sj18/20180501.htm

/// Voting Yes to table Amdt No. 11 were 16 R’s and 14 D’s. These 16 Republicans were: Bennett, Campbell, Campsen, Davis,  Gregory, Grooms, Hembree, Leatherman, Massey, Peeler, Rankin, Senn, Shealy, Talley, Turner, Young

/// Of these 16 Republicans voting Yes to table, 8 are listed as cosponsors of S217  ( https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess122_2017-2018/bills/217.htm): Gregory, Grooms, Hembree, Peeler, Shealy, Talley, Turner, Young

/// The one Democrat cosponsoring S217 (Williams) also voted  to table Amdt No. 11

/// Voting No against tabling Amdt No. 11 were 11 R’s. These 11 Republicans were: Alexander, Cash, Climer, Corbin, Cromer, Gambrell, Goldfinch, Martin, Rice, Timmons, Verdin

/// Of these 11 Republicans voting No against tabling Amdt No. 11, 10 of the 11 (all except Alexander) are listed as cosponsors of S217

/// In summary, S217 Personhood Bill has 19 cosponsors (18 R, 1 D); and of these, 10 R’s voted No against tabling; and of these, 8 R’s, 1 D voted Yes to table

/// So 10 of 19 cosponsors of S217 voted in favor; and 9 of 19 cosponsors of S217 voted against, adding language of S217 Personhood Bill to language of H3548 Dismemberment Bill as per Amdt No. 11. ///

[ End ]

2018 SC Legislature Personhood Report

SC Senate ‘Abortion’ Bills battle, May 1 – 4 – Report #3:

Published by:

Christians for Personhood ( CP )
Columbia, South Carolina
May 10, 2018

SC Senate ‘Abortion’ Bills battle, May 1 – 4 – Report #3:
_______________________________
_______________________________

[ Report sent previously by text ]

SC Senate ‘Abortion’ Bills battle, May 1 – 4 – Report #3:

Personhood Bill S217 vs Hutto “Hyde-Amdt”-type fake “pro-life” replacement amdt to H3548 vs SCCL’s euthanasia Dismemberment Bill H3548

/// On Wed, May 2, Senator Cash offered six amdt’s (No. 12 to No. 17) to H3548 Dismemberment Bill.  Amdt No. 12 exposed the pro-euthanasia aspect of H3548 and attempted to close the “Euthanasia first (Kill the Baby first); then Dismember the Baby” loophole, by proscribing first killing the unborn child, and then dismembering the child

/// However, even that change was opposed by Senator Grooms, who served as point man for H3548, reporting H3548 was supported WITHOUT amdt by National Right to Life, SC Citizens for Life, SC Baptist Convention, SC (Roman) Catholic Conference, and the SC Assn of Pregnancy Centers. These groups support legislation which incrementally regulates child-murder. NONE are supporting Personhood Bill S217

/// After about 3 1/2 hrs of debate, Cash Amdt No. 12 was defeated on 7 Y – 30 N Roll Call vote.  See Senate Journal for 5/2/2018 – https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess122_2017-2018/sj18/20180502.htm

/// On the previous day, Tues, May 1, when H3548 came up on the Special Order portion of the Senate Calendar (about 5:30pm) Senator Cash proposed Amdt No. 11, which added all of the language contained in Personhood Bill S217; to all the text of Dismemberment Bill H3548, plus one additional sentence proscribing dismemberment of the baby in the case of providing medical treatment to prevent the death of pregnant woman

/// The debate lasted about 1 1/2 hrs, and then Cash Amdt No. 11 was tabled on a 30 Y – 11 N Roll Call vote. See Senate Journal for 5/1/2018 – https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess122_2017-2018/sj18/20180501.htm

/// Voting Yes to table  Amdt No. 11 were 16 R’s and 14 D’s. Voting No against tabling were 11 R’s

/// S217 Personhood Bill has 19 cosponsors (18 R, 1 D). Of these, 10 R’s  voted No against tabling. Of these, 8 R’s, 1 D voted Yes to table. ///

[ End ]

2018 SC Legislature Personhood Report

SC Senate ‘Abortion’ Bills battle, May 1 – 4, 2018 – Report #2:

Published by:

Christians for Personhood ( CP )
Columbia, South Carolina
May 8, 2018

SC Senate ‘Abortion’ Bills battle, May 1 – 4, 2018 – Report #2:
_____________________________
_____________________________

[ Report sent previously by text ]

SC Senate ‘Abortion’ Bills battle, May 1 – 4 – Report #2:

Personhood Bill S217 vs Hutto “Hyde-Amdt”-type fake “pro-life” replacement amdt to H3548 vs SCCL’s euthanasia Dismemberment Bill H3548

/// The Hutto “Hyde-Amdt”-type fake “pro-life” replacement amdt language which supplanted the euthanasia Dismemberment Bill language was adopted on a 24 Y – 1 N vote about 9:45pm Wed night, May 2. About one hour later before adjourning for the night, the Senate gave Second Reading (28 Y – 10 N) to H3548, which was now a much different bill, although not a Personhood or true “pro-life” bill. This Hutto/Hyde fake “pro-life” bill did NOT establish Personhood, and had several child-murder “exceptions” for rape, incest, life and serious health risk of mother.

/// The two Roll Call votes above  are listed in Senate Journal for 5/2/2018
– https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess122_2017-2018/sj18/20180502.htm

/// Earlier same day, Wed, May 2 (beginning after 3:30pm and continuing into evening), Senator Cash cont’d to offer several Amdt’s (he began with his first major Amdt Tues evening, May 1) to H3548 Dismemberment Bill, which was then still in its pro-euthanasia form; “Redefining How to Kill Babies”, allowing dismemberment of unborn children after  first euthanizing  (murdering) them inside the womb, by sticking a long needle into baby’s heart with an injection, to stop the heart, intentionally causing death. This sick legislation advocated by SC Citizens for “Life” is NOT Pro-Life !!!

/// Amdt No. 12 offered by Senator Cash exposed the pro-euthanasia aspect of H3548 and attempted to close the “Euthanasia first (Kill the Baby first); then Dismember the Baby” loophole, by adding language to also proscribe “… after first killing a living unborn child, knowingly to dismember an unborn child and extract him one piece at a time from the uterus…”

/// None of the several Amdt’s proposed by Senator Cash to H3548 on Wed, May 2 were adopted; text of each one may be seen in Senate Journal ///

[ End ]