Christians for Personhood

2019 SC Legislature Columbia Christians for Life

SC Abortion/Abortionist Funding

August 29, 2019 Published by: personhood

Columbia Christians for Life ( CCL )
aka Christians for Life and Liberty ( CLL )
Columbia, South Carolina
August 28, 2019

SC ‘Abortion’ / ‘Abortionist’ Funding:

May 28
Office of the Governor
SC State House
Columbia, SC

SC Governor Henry McMaster’s Budget Vetoes Did Not Cure either the ‘Abortion’ Funding ( PEBA Proviso 108.4 ), or the ‘Abortionist’ / Planned Parenthood Funding ( DHHS Proviso 33.25 ), in the H.4000 FY 2019-2020 SC State Budget as Passed and Ratified by the Fake ‘Pro-Life’ [sic] Republican-Super-Majority SC HOUSE and the Fake ‘Pro-Life’ [sic] Republican-Majority SC SENATE; in fact Governor McMaster’s own proposed Executive Budget also contained ‘Abortion’ Funding ( PEBA Proviso 108.4 )

________________________
________________________

Note: The Conference Committee Report for H4000 State Budget was adopted in the SC House by a vote of 105 – 6 and in the SC Senate by a vote of 32 – 8, both votes occurring Tuesday, May 21, 2019.
_____________________________________

Fake ‘Pro-Life’ [sic] Republican-Majority SC SENATE:

Senate Roll Call Vote Number 442
Session: 123 (2019-2020)
05/21/2019 01:27 pm

to adopt the conference report
RESULT: Passed
Ayes: 32; Nays: 8; Excused Absence: 4

H 4000 Appropriations Bill, 2019-2020
https://www.scstatehouse.gov/votehistory.php?KEY=16879

Of the 46 Senators ( 27 R, 19 D ) in the SC Senate, 32 Senators ( 18 R, 14 D ) voted “Aye” on their final vote May 21 on the FY 2019-2020 SC State Budget funding “Abortion” and
“Abortionist”/Planned Parenthood. The only eight Senators ( all Republicans ) who voted “Nay” against the SC State Budget which funds Child-Murder and Child-Murderers were:

Cash, Richard
Climer, Wes
Corbin, Thomas
Grooms, Larry
Hembree, Greg
Massey, Shane
Rice, Rex
Senn, Sandy

SC Senate Journal – May 21, 2019
H. 4000–REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE OF CONFERENCE ADOPTED
https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess123_2019-2020/sj19/20190521.htm

___________________________________

Fake ‘Pro-Life’ [sic] Republican-Super-Majority SC HOUSE

House Roll Call Vote Number 703
Session: 123 (2019-2020)
05/21/2019 02:32 pm

Adopt Conference Report
RESULT: Passed
Yeas: 105; Nays: 6; Excused Absence: 7; Not Voting: 4

H 4000 Appropriations Bill, 2019-2020
https://www.scstatehouse.gov/votehistory.php?KEY=16889

Of the 124 House seats [ minus vacancies ] in the SC HOUSE, 105 House Representatives ( 66 R, 39 D ) voted “Aye” on their final vote May 21 on the FY 2019-2020 SC State Budget funding “Abortion” and “Abortionist”/Planned Parenthood.
The only six House Representatives ( all Republicans ) who voted “Nay” against the SC State Budget which funds Child-Murder and Child-Murderers were:

Hill, Jonathon
Jones, Stewart
Long, Steven
Mace, Nancy
Magnuson, Josiah
Trantham, Ashley

SC House Journal – May 21, 2019
H. 4000–RULE 5.14 WAIVED AND CONFERENCE REPORT ADOPTED
https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess123_2019-2020/hj19/20190521.htm

______________________
______________________

SC Governor McMaster’s Budget Veto Message
H. 4000 FY 2019-2020 Budget Vetoes (PDF)
May 28, 2019
___________________________

H.4000 FY 2019-2020 SC State Budget

H.4000 – As Ratified by the General Assembly on May 22, 2019. Governor’s vetoes are marked. Enacted on June 25, 2019.

PART IB PROVISOS
( Sections listed separately)
*** Section 33 (DHHS) Provisos [ ‘Abortionist’ / Planned Parenthood Funding ( Proviso 33.25 ) ]
*** Section 108 (PEBA) Provisos [ ‘Abortion’ Funding ( Proviso 108.4 ) ]
( PDF format for Part IB )

H. 4000 — Governor’s Veto Message – May 28, 2019

H. 4000 – Conference Report Adopted by the General Assembly on May 21, 2019

_________________________
_________________________

May 21 Columbia, SC
SC State House

Republican-Super-Majority SC HOUSE and Republican-Majority SC SENATE approve SC State Budget Conf Comm Rpt with Baby-Killing ( Proviso 108.4) and Baby-Killer/Planned Parenthood ( Proviso 33.25) FUNDING; Bill now goes to SC Gov McMaster
http://christiansforpersonhood.com/index.php/2019/08/20/647/

living unborn baby at eight weeks
http://clinicquotes.com/abortion-at-8-weeks-pictures/

Note: The Conference Committee Report for H4000 State Budget was adopted in the SC House by a vote of 105 – 6 and in the SC Senate by a vote of 32 – 8, both votes occurring Tuesday, May 21, 2019. H4000 was ratified on May 22, 2019, and next was sent to the SC Governor.

As this May 21 version of the SC State Budget approved by both the SC House and SC Senate contains funding for genocidal mass murderers Planned Parenthood (Section 33 – DHHS), and also contains funding for certain ‘Abortions’ in the State Health Insurance Plan (Section 108 – PEBA), that means the version of the SC State Budget as passed by the SC Legislature on May 21 still requires South Carolina taxpayers to fund PLANNED PARENTHOOD for now and to fund certain ‘Abortions’. If even one child in the womb is murdered during FY 2019-2020 ( July 1, 2019 – June 30, 2020 ) using funds appropriated in H4000 as approved May 21 by SC House members, and as approved May 21 by SC Senate members, as well as earlier applicable votes in the legislative process taken in the SC House and the SC Senate, then each and every House and Senate member voting to appropriate such money, or voting against efforts to stop the appropriation of such money, will consequently thereby be an accessory to murder before-the-fact, the fraudulent, unrighteous, immoral, and unconstitutional Opinion of the US Supreme Court in Roe v Wade notwithstanding.

Note: The SC DHHS funding of Planned Parenthood is NOT directly for surgical or RU-486 “abortions”, but for so-called “family planning funds”, which may include chemically abortifacient “birth control”. Any government (taxpayer) money given to Planned Parenthood helps sustain their operation as a child-murder center. Two of the three stand-alone child-murder centers remaining in South Carolina are operated by Planned Parenthood [ located in Charleston and Columbia ].

_______________________
_______________________

H.4000 FY 2019-2020 SC State Budget [ Beginning July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020 ]

SC State Budget signed into Law by SC Governor Henry McMaster includes:

‘Abortion’ Funding ( PEBA Proviso 108.4 ) and ‘Abortionist’ / Planned Parenthood Funding
( DHHS Proviso 33.25 ) in the H.4000 FY 2019-2020 SC State Budget:

___________________________

Section 33 (DHHS): ‘Abortionist’ / Planned Parenthood Funding ( Proviso 33.25 )

SECTION 33 – J020 – DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

[ emphasis, comments below added ]

33.25. (DHHS: Family Planning Funds) The State has enacted Section 43-5-1185 of the 1976 Code that prohibits state funds, directly or indirectly, from being utilized by Planned Parenthood for abortions, abortion services or procedures, or administrative functions related to abortions. Having prevented Planned Parenthood from performing abortions with state funds, once the federal injunction is lifted ***, the Department of Health and Human Services may not direct any federal funds to Planned Parenthood. An otherwise qualified organization may not be disqualified from receipt of these funds because of its affiliation with an organization that provides abortion services, provided that the affiliated organization that provides abortion services is independent of the qualified organization. An independent affiliate that provides abortion services must be separately incorporated from any organization that receives these funds. An organization that provides abortion services in compliance with Part 1.B., Proviso 33.12 of this act is excepted from the above restriction on state family planning funds and may receive state family planning funds.

*** In other words, DEFUNDING OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD DOES NOT GO INTO EFFECT NOW !
That is, for now, funding for Planned Parenthood goes on “business as usual” !!! This is a fake “pro-life” [ sic ] proviso !!! The federal injunction blocking this particular legal / legislative strategy to defund Planned Parenthood has been in place since August 2018 !!!

Why did the SC House and SC Senate not adopt the effective proviso from the SC Governor’s Proposed Executive Budget [Proviso 33.24] which utilized a different legislative strategy to defund Planned Parenthood ?

[ See further below ]

_______________________

Section 108 (PEBA): ‘Abortion’ Funding ( Proviso 108.4 )

SECTION 108 – F500 – PUBLIC EMPLOYEE BENEFIT AUTHORITY

[ emphasis, comments below added ]

108.4. (PEBA: Funding Abortions Prohibited) No funds appropriated for employer contributions to the State Health Insurance Plan may be expended to reimburse the expenses of an abortion, except *** in cases of rape, incest or where the mother’s medical condition is one which, on the basis of the physician’s good faith judgment, so complicates the pregnancy as to necessitate an immediate abortion to avert the risk of her death or for which a delay will create serious risk of substantial and irreversible impairment of major bodily function, and the State Health Plan may not offer coverage for abortion services, including ancillary services provided contemporaneously with abortion services. The Public Employee Benefit Authority must determine the amount of the total premium paid for health coverage necessary to cover the risks associated with reimbursing participants in the plan for obtaining an abortion in the circumstances covered by this provision. The determination must be based on actuarial data and empirical study in the same manner and by the same method that other risks are adjusted for in similar circumstances. The plan must report this determination annually to the respective Chairmen of the Senate Finance Committee and the House Ways and Means Committee.

*** In other words, THE TAX-FUNDED MURDER OF CERTAIN CHILDREN IN THE WOMB IS STILL AUTHORIZED IN THE SOUTH CAROLINA STATE BUDGET !!!

This is in the SC State Budget passed and ratified and sent to the SC Governor by the Fake ‘Pro-Life’ [sic] Republican-Super-Majority SC HOUSE and the Fake ‘Pro-Life’ [sic] Republican-Majority SC SENATE !!!

_______________________________

PERSONHOOD ACT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AND SCRIPTURAL BASIS OF HUMAN LAWS
http://christiansforpersonhood.com/index.php/2019/01/01/personhood-act-of-south-carolina-and-scriptural-basis-of-human-laws/
December 31, 2018/Revised January 2, 2019

Personhood Report: In Law, No Exceptions to Human Personhood
November 30, 2018 / Edited December 4, 2018
http://christiansforpersonhood.com/index.php/2018/12/04/in-law-no-exceptions-to-human-personhood/

Personhood Report: No Exceptions to Personhood
January 27, 2018
http://christiansforpersonhood.com/index.php/2018/01/29/personhood-report-no-exceptions-to-personhood/

_________________
_________________

Re: Executive Budget Proposed by SC Governor Henry McMaster, January 14, 2019

Section 33 ( DHHS )

Where was the vigorous, public debate over adopting the effective language to defund Planned Parenthood in Section 33 (DHHS) contained in the
SC Governor’s January 19, 2019 Proposed Executive Budget, in Proviso 33.24 of that Document ?

Why did the SC House and SC Senate not adopt the effective proviso from the SC Governor’s Proposed Executive Budget [ Proviso 33.24 ] which utilized a different legislative strategy to defund Planned Parenthood ?
____________________

SC Governor McMaster’s Proposed Budget for FY 2019-2020

Governor McMaster’s Executive Budget Fiscal Year 2019-2020 (PDF)
Part IA, Appropriations (PDF)
Statement of Revenues (PDF)
Part IB (PDF)

SC Governor
Executive Budget
State of South Carolina
Fiscal Year 2019-20
https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess123_2019-2020/appropriations2019/gbud1920.pdf
Governor Henry McMaster
January 14, 2019

FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 PROVISOS
PART IB
OPERATION OF STATE GOVERNMENT
PAGE 251

FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 PROVISOS
PAGE 322
SECTION 33 – J020 – DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess123_2019-2020/appropriations2019/GOVPartIB.pdf

33.24. (DHHS: Defunding Planned Parenthood) The Department of Health and Human Services may not accept federal funds for family planning. None of the state funds appropriated for family planning may be expended to directly or indirectly subsidize abortion services or procedures or administrative functions and none of the funds appropriated herein may be paid or granted to an organization that provides abortion services. An otherwise qualified organization may not be disqualified from receipt of these funds because of its affiliation with an organization that provides abortion services, provided that the affiliated organization that provides abortion services is independent of the qualified organization. An independent affiliate the provides abortion services must be separately incorporated from any organization that receives these funds. An organization that provides abortion services where the life of the mother is at risk and the termination of the pregnancy is incidental to the lifesaving intervention is excepted from the above restriction on state family planning funds and may receive state family planning funds, provided that the physician shall act in accordance with the standard of care to preserve both the life of the mother and the life of the pre-born child.

Why did the SC House and SC Senate not adopt this effective proviso from the SC Governor’s Proposed Executive Budget [ Proviso 33.24 ] which utilized a different legislative strategy to defund Planned Parenthood ?

_________________________
_________________________

Re: Executive Budget Proposed by SC Governor Henry McMaster,
January 14, 2019

Section 108 ( PEBA )

It is grievous to see that even in the Proposed Executive Budget submitted by SC Governor Henry McMaster, January 14, 2019, as pertains to Section 108 ( PEBA ), the wickedness of tax-funded murder of certain children in the womb was contained in the SC Governor’s own proposed SC State Budget !!!

SC Governor McMaster’s Proposed Budget for FY 2019-2020

Governor McMaster’s Executive Budget Fiscal Year 2019-2020 (PDF)
Part IA, Appropriations (PDF)
Statement of Revenues (PDF)
Part IB (PDF)

SC Governor
Executive Budget
State of South Carolina
Fiscal Year 2019-20
https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess123_2019-2020/appropriations2019/gbud1920.pdf
Governor Henry McMaster
January 14, 2019

FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 PROVISOS
PART IB
OPERATION OF STATE GOVERNMENT
PAGE 251

FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 PROVISOS
PAGE 413
SECTION 108 – F500 – PUBLIC EMPLOYEE BENEFIT AUTHORITY
https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess123_2019-2020/appropriations2019/GOVPartIB.pdf

108.4. (PEBA: Funding Abortions Prohibited) No funds appropriated for employer contributions to the State Health Insurance Plan may be expended to reimburse the expenses of an abortion, except*** in cases of rape, incest or where the mother’s medical condition is one which, on the basis of the physician’s good faith judgment, so complicates the pregnancy as to necessitate an immediate abortion to avert the risk of her death or for which a delay will create serious risk of substantial and irreversible impairment of major bodily function, and the State Health Plan may not offer coverage for abortion services, including ancillary services provided contemporaneously with abortion services. The Public Employee Benefit Authority must determine the amount of the total premium paid for health coverage necessary to cover the risks associated with reimbursing participants in the plan for obtaining an abortion in the circumstances covered by this provision. The determination must be based on actuarial data and empirical study in the same manner and by the same method that other risks are adjusted for in similar circumstances. The plan must report this determination annually to the respective Chairmen of the Senate Finance Committee and the House Ways and Means Committee.

*** In other words, THE TAX-FUNDED MURDER OF CERTAIN CHILDREN IN THE WOMB WAS PROPOSED IN THE SC GOVERNOR’S EXECUTIVE BUDGET !!!

This taxpayer-funding of selected child-murder was in the Proposed Executive Budget submitted by SC Governor Henry McMaster on January 14, 2019 !!!

______________________
______________________

Previous Published Reports Related to “Abortion” and “Abortionist” / Planned Parenthood Funding in the FY 2019 – 2020 SC State Budget:

[ Edited ]

_______________________
_______________________

2019 SC Legislature Columbia Christians for Life

Republican-Super-Majority SC HOUSE and Republican-Majority SC SENATE approve SC State Budget Conf Comm Rpt with Baby-Killing (Proviso 108.4) and Baby-Killer/Planned Parenthood (Proviso 33.25) FUNDING; Bill now goes to SC Gov McMaster

August 20, 2019 Published by: personhood

Columbia Christians for Life ( CCL )
aka Christians for Life and Liberty ( CLL )
Columbia, South Carolina
May 22, 2019 / August 20, 2019

May 21 Columbia, SC
SC State House

Republican-Super-Majority SC HOUSE and Republican-Majority SC SENATE approve SC State Budget Conf Comm Rpt with Baby-Killing (Proviso 108.4) and Baby-Killer/Planned Parenthood ( Proviso 33.25) FUNDING; Bill now goes to SC Gov McMaster

living unborn baby at eight weeks
http://clinicquotes.com/abortion-at-8-weeks-pictures/

Note: The Conference Committee Report for H4000 State Budget was adopted in the SC House by a vote of 105 – 6 and in the SC Senate by a vote of 32 – 8, both votes occurring Tuesday, May 21, 2019. H4000 was ratified on May 21, 2019, and next is sent to the SC Governor.

As this May 21 version of the SC State Budget approved by both the SC House and SC Senate contains funding for genocidal mass murderers Planned Parenthood (Section 33 – DHHS), and also contains funding for certain ‘Abortions’ in the State Health Insurance Plan (Section 108 – PEBA), that means the version of the SC State Budget as passed by the SC Legislature on May 21 still requires South Carolina taxpayers to fund PLANNED PARENTHOOD for now and to fund certain ‘Abortions’. If even one child in the womb is murdered during FY 2019-2020 ( July 1, 2019 – June 30, 2020 ) using funds appropriated in H4000 as approved May 21 by SC House members, and as approved May 21 by SC Senate members, as well as earlier applicable votes in the legislative process taken in the SC House and the SC Senate, then each and every House and Senate member voting to appropriate such money, or voting against efforts to stop the appropriation of such money, will consequently thereby be an accessory to murder before-the-fact, the fraudulent, unrighteous, immoral, and unconstitutional Opinion of the US Supreme Court in Roe v Wade notwithstanding.

Note: The SC DHHS funding of Planned Parenthood is NOT directly for surgical or RU-486 “abortions”, but for so-called “family planning funds”, which may include chemically abortifacient “birth control”. Any government (taxpayer) money given to Planned Parenthood helps sustain their operation as a child-murder center. Two of the three stand-alone child-murder centers remaining in South Carolina are operated by Planned Parenthood [ located in Charleston and Columbia ].

_______________________
_______________________

Note: This Report initially sent out by text on May 22.

[ Edited ]

Tues, May 21
SC State House

Republican-Super-Majority SC HOUSE and Republican-Majority SC SENATE approve SC State Budget Conf Comm Rpt with Baby-Killing (Proviso 108.4) and Baby-Killer/ Planned Parenthood (Proviso 33.25) FUNDING; Bill now goes to SC Gov McMaster
—-

SC House 5/21 Roll Call vote to adopt H4000 State Budget Conf Comm Rpt:
https://www.scstatehouse.gov/votehistory.php?KEY=16889

Result: Passed Yeas: 105; Nays: 6; Excused Absence: 7; Not Voting: 4

Note: Out of 122 House members, only 6 voted Nay: Hill, Jones, Long, Mace, Magnuson, Trantham;
105 voted Yea.

Note: SC House is 78 R, 44 D, 2 vac.(almost 64 percent “Republican”)
—-

SC Senate 5/21 Roll Call Vote to adopt H4000 State Budget Conf Comm Rpt:
https://www.scstatehouse.gov/votehistory.php?KEY=16879

RESULT: Passed Ayes: 32; Nays: 8; Excused Absence: 4

32 Ayes (18 R, 14 D)
Alexander, Allen, Bennett, Campbell, Campsen, Cromer, Davis, Fanning, Goldfinch, Gregory, Harpootlian, Hutto, Jackson, Johnson, Leatherman, Loftis, Martin, J. Matthews, McElveen, Nicholson, Peeler, Rankin, Reese, Sabb, Scott, Setzler, Shealy, Talley, Turner, Verdin, Williams, Young

8 Nays (8 R)
Cash, Climer, Corbin, Grooms, Hembree, Massey, Rice, Senn
—-

BABY-KILLING FUNDING

Funding of certain “abortions” in Proviso 108.4 through State Health Insurance Plan in H4000 State Budget Conf Comm Rpt:
https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess123_2019-2020/appropriations2019/crp1b.htm#s108
—-

BABY-KILLER/ PLANNED PARENTHOOD FUNDING

Ongoing funding for now of genocidal mass murderers Planned Parenthood in Proviso 33.25 through SC DHHS in H4000 State Budget Conf Comm Rpt:
https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess123_2019-2020/appropriations2019/crp1b.htm#s33
—-

Will SC Governor McMaster line item veto Proviso 108.4 and Proviso 33.25?

Call SC Gov Office at 803-734-2100 and send e-mail through governor.sc.gov website.
—-

“God is not mocked” Galatians 6:7, kjv

Proverb 6:16,17, kjv

Hebrews 10:31, kjv

Columbia Christians for Life

Planned Parenthood

Re: Certain ‘Abortion’-funding in Section 108, Proviso 108.4 and Funding of Planned Parenthood for now in Section 33, Proviso 33.25

July 31, 2019 Published by: personhood

Columbia Christians for Life ( CCL )
aka Christians for Life and Liberty ( CLL )
Columbia, South Carolina
May 20, 2019 / Edited July 31, 2019

Re: Certain ‘Abortion’-funding in Section 108, Proviso 108.4

and

Funding of Planned Parenthood for now in Section 33, Proviso 33.25

________________________________
________________________________

Monday, May 20, SC State House:

Will SC House and SC Senate vote Free Conference powers to State Budget Conf Comm to remove ‘Abortion’ and Planned Parenthood Funding?

Or will fake “Republican” majorities force SC taxpayers to pay for more Baby-Killing (Section 108) and Baby-Killer (Section 33) Funding?
—–

If Republicans are not really fake “RINO’s”, they can and should:

1) Vote for Free Conference powers for H4000 State Budget Bill Conference Committee
(Senators Leatherman, Bennett, Jackson; Rep’s GM Smith, Simrill, Rutherford – scstatehouse.gov).

2) Remove ‘Abortion’ Funding from Section 108 (PEBA) in State Health Insurance Plan as per Senator Cash Amdt No. 22 on April 17, as cited in this report:

April 17
‘SC Senate votes against stopping State-funding of certain “abortions” through SC State Health Insurance Plan (PEBA)’
http://christiansforpersonhood.com/index.php/2019/04/23/sc-senate-votes-against-stopping-state-funding-of-certain-abortions-through-sc-state-health-insurance-plan-peba/

3) Remove Planned Parenthood Funding from Section 33 (DHHS) as per Governor McMaster’s effective Proviso 33.24, as cited in this report:

April 18
‘SC Senate continues SC DHHS funding of Planned Parenthood for now; adopts still ineffective revised version of ineffective Proviso 33.25, without adopting Governor’s effective Proviso 33.24’
http://christiansforpersonhood.com/index.php/2019/04/24/sc-senate-continues-sc-dhhs-funding-of-planned-parenthood-for-now-adopts-still-ineffective-revised-version-of-ineffective-proviso-33-25-without-adopting-governors-effective-proviso-33-24/
—–

[ Portion omitted ]

Psalm 75:7, kjv
Daniel 2:21, kjv

Columbia Christians for Life

ChristianLifeandLiberty.net

Personhood

AL Senate Passes Near Total ‘Abortion’ Ban Bill – HB314 May 14 (HB314 is not a Personhood Bill)

July 1, 2019 Published by: personhood

Christians for Personhood ( CP )
Columbia, South Carolina
May 15, 2019

AL Senate Passes Near Total ‘Abortion’ Ban Bill

– HB314 May 14 ( HB314 is not a Personhood Bill )

living unborn baby at eight weeks
http://clinicquotes.com/abortion-at-8-weeks-pictures/

___________________________
___________________________

AL.com
Alabama abortion ban bill passes: No exceptions for rape, incest; Bill awaits Kay Ivey decision
A look at the process in the Alabama Senate as legislators eventually voted to approve the nation’s toughest abortion law.
https://www.al.com/news/de8b00-alabama-abortion-bill.html
Updated: May 15, 2019, 11:20 AM; Posted: May 14, 2019, 11:20 AM

AL.com
Alabama abortion ban passes overwhelmingly with no changes
https://www.al.com/news/2019/05/alabama-abortion-ban-passes-overwhelmingly-with-no-changes.html
May 15, 2019

Rep. Terri Collins, R-Decatur, speaks at a press conference after her bill to make abortion a felony in Alabama won final passage in the state Senate. On the left is Sen. Clyde Chambliss, R-Prattville, who handled the bill in the Senate. Rep. Rich Wingo, R-Tuscaloosa, a co-sponsor of the legislation, is on the right.

Excerpts:

Alabama lawmakers aiming to challenge abortion rights nationally are one step from their goal of putting an almost total ban on the procedure into state law.

The Senate tonight voted 25-6 to pass a bill to make it a felony for a doctor to perform an abortion.
The bill is a priority for the Legislature’s Republican majority. Tonight’s vote sends it to Republican Gov. Kay Ivey, who could sign it into law.

AL.com
Alabama passes abortion ban: Hollywood, lawmakers weigh in; what they’re saying around the country
https://www.al.com/news/2019/05/alabama-passes-abortion-ban-hollywood-lawmakers-weigh-in-what-theyre-saying-around-the-country.html
May 15, 2019

Excerpt:
Alabama’s passage of the nation’s strictest abortion law – one that would make it a felony for doctors to perform the procedure – passed the State Senate last night. Only Gov. Kay Ivey’s signature stands between the measure and enactment, a move that pro-choice groups said will trigger a wave of lawsuits.

_____________________________
_____________________________

Christians for Personhood comments:

Alabama HB314 is a near total “abortion” ban bill – the strongest bill banning almost all “abortions” in the United States. However, the bill has “exceptions” and so is not a true, principled Personhood bill. HB314 does not establish legal personhood at fertilization ( conception ) with no “exceptions” for all human beings. Furthermore, HB314 is also flawed because it never holds the mother accountable as either a principal or accessory in those circumstances where such is warranted.

HB314 is stronger than the recent ‘Heartbeat’ bills, and bans nearly all surgical and RU486 “abortions” (child-murders) committed upon women who are known to be pregnant, including banning rape and incest “abortions”. However HB314 does not ban early abortifacient chemical “abortions”, and has certain “exceptions”.

Specifically, HB314 still allows killing the baby in the case of “lethal anomaly” and “serious health risk” to the mother.
HB314 also never holds the woman accountable as a principal or even as an accessory in those circumstances where such is warranted.

_________________________________
_________________________________

Bill Summary: AL HB314
https://legiscan.com/AL/bill/HB314/2019
Text: Latest bill text (Introduced) [PDF]
[ Note: Final version of bill as passed by Senate May 14, 2019 was identical to bill as introduced April 2, 2019. ]

Bill Text: AL HB314
https://legiscan.com/AL/text/HB314/id/1980843/Alabama-2019-HB314-Introduced.pdf
Excerpts [ emphasis, comments added ]:

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT

Relating to abortion; to make abortion and attempted abortion felony offenses except in cases where abortion is necessary [ sic ] in order to prevent a serious health risk to the unborn child’s mother; to provide that a woman who receives an abortion will not be held criminally culpable or civilly liable for receiving the abortion;

continued…

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF ALABAMA:

Section 1. This act shall be known as The Alabama Human Life Protection Act.

continued..

Section 3. As used in this act, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

(1) ABORTION. The use or prescription of any instrument, medicine, drug, or any other substance or device with the intent to terminate the pregnancy of a woman known to be pregnant with knowledge that the termination by those means will with reasonable likelihood cause the death
of the unborn child. The term does not include these activities if done with the intent to save the life or preserve the health of an unborn child, remove a dead unborn child, to deliver the unborn child prematurely to avoid a serious health risk to the unborn child’s mother, or to preserve the health of her unborn child. The term does not include a procedure or act to terminate the pregnancy of a woman with an ectopic pregnancy, nor does it include the procedure or act to terminate the pregnancy of a woman when the unborn child has a lethal anomaly.

continued…

Section 4. (a) It shall be unlawful for any person to intentionally perform or attempt to perform an abortion except as provided for by subsection (b).

(b) An abortion shall be permitted if an attending physician licensed in Alabama determines that an abortion is necessary [ sic ] in order to prevent a serious health risk to the unborn child’s mother. …

continued…

Section 5. No woman upon whom an abortion is performed or attempted to be performed shall be criminally or civilly liable. Furthermore, no physician confirming the serious health risk to the child’s mother shall be criminally or civilly liable for those actions.

Section 6. (a) An abortion performed in violation of this act is a Class A felony.

(b) An attempted abortion performed in violation of this act is a Class C felony.

continued…

Section 8. The construction of existing statutes and regulations that regulate or recognize abortion in Alabama that are in conflict with or antagonistic to this act shall be repealed as null and void and shall recognize the prohibition of abortion as provided in this act. If this act is challenged and enjoined pending a final judicial decision, the existing statutes and regulations that regulate or recognize abortion shall remain in effect during that time.

_________________________________
_________________________________

Christians for Personhood comments:

It should also be noted, that while rare, not every medically-defined ectopic pregnancy is lethal to the mother, and there are examples of certain such unborn children surviving and being born. Not all medically-defined ectopic pregnanices are “tubal ectopic” pregnances. See the testimony of an ectopic pregnancy survivor himself in the documentary video below of various testimonies of pregnancies in difficult circumstances handled in love and with a respect for the sanctity of human life, at video time 44:45.

Pro-Life Without Exception [ Testimonies ]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=8&v=zwazODlTOBk
Is abortion helpful in cases of rape or incest? What about fetal deformity? What about threats to the life or health of the mother? Hear the stories of those who have actually been involved in these difficult circumstance.

_________________________________

Although HB314 defines an UNBORN CHILD, CHILD or PERSON as a human being, HB314‘s “exceptions” render the bill flawed insofar as identifying the bill as a Personhood Bill. HB314 is not a Personhood Bill. While HB314 is better than “Heartbeat” bills, HB314 fails to learn from criticisms of the US Supreme Court on aspects of the Texas law overturned in Roe v Wade in Footnote #54 of the Roe Opinion:

ROE v. WADE FindLaw – Footnote #54
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/410/113.html#f54

United States Supreme Court
ROE v. WADE (1973)
No. 70-18
Argued: December 13, 1971 Decided: January 22, 1973

[ Reargued: October 11, 1972 – this is where personhood of the “fetus” is emphasized – search for “oyez.org, Roe” for audio and transcript ]

[ Footnote 54 ] When Texas urges that a fetus is entitled to Fourteenth Amendment protection as a person, it faces a dilemma. Neither in Texas nor in any other State are all abortions prohibited. Despite broad proscription, an exception always exists. The exception contained [410 U.S. 113, 158] in Art. 1196, for an abortion procured or attempted by medical advice for the purpose of saving the life of the mother, is typical. But if the fetus is a person who is not to be deprived of life without due process of law, and if the mother’s condition is the sole determinant, does not the Texas exception appear to be out of line with the Amendment’s command?

There are other inconsistencies between Fourteenth Amendment status and the typical abortion statute. It has already been pointed out, n. 49, supra, that in Texas the woman is not a principal or an accomplice with respect to an abortion upon her. If the fetus is a person, why is the woman not a principal or an accomplice? Further, the penalty for criminal abortion specified by Art. 1195 is significantly less than the maximum penalty for murder
prescribed by Art. 1257 of the Texas Penal Code. If the fetus is a person, may the penalties be different?

__________________________
__________________________

Additional reports:

PERSONHOOD ACT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
AND SCRIPTURAL BASIS OF HUMAN LAWS
Christians for Personhood newsletter
Steve Lefemine, Christian pro-life missionary
exec. dir., Christians for Personhood
December 31, 2018

Personhood Report: In Law, No Exceptions to Human Personhood
November 30, 2018 / Edited December 4, 2018

Personhood Report: No Exceptions to Personhood
January 27, 2018

No Exceptions
http://christiansforpersonhood.com/index.php/no-exceptions/

Pro-Life Without Exception [ Testimonies ]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=8&v=zwazODlTOBk
Video – 58:33
Views – 6,038

Is abortion helpful in cases of rape or incest? What about fetal deformity? What about threats to the life or health of the mother? Hear the stories of those who have actually been involved in these difficult circumstance.

2019 SC Legislature Planned Parenthood

Republican-Super-Majority SC House amends SC Senate April 18 version of SC State Budget (H4000) by first restoring House version passed March 13, including Planned Parenhood Funding (DHHS) and ‘Abortion’ Funding (PEBA); Amdt 1A adopted by 110-0 Vote

June 15, 2019 Published by: personhood

Columbia Christians for Life ( CCL )
aka Christians for Life and Liberty ( CLL )
Columbia, South Carolina
May 9, 2019

May 7 Columbia, SC

Republican-Super-Majority SC House amends SC Senate April 18 version of SC State Budget ( H4000) by first restoring House version passed March 13, including Planned Parenhood Funding ( DHHS) and ‘Abortion’ Funding ( PEBA); Amdt 1A adopted by 110-0 Vote

living unborn baby at eight weeks
http://clinicquotes.com/abortion-at-8-weeks-pictures/

Note: The SC House amended the SC Senate version of the SC State Budget on May 7, starting off by replacing the entire Senate version with the version passed by the House on March 13, by a vote of 110-0 ( Amdt No. 1A). As the March 13 version passed by the SC House also contained funding for genocidal mass murderers Planned Parenthood (Section 33 – DHHS), and also contained funding for certain ‘Abortions’ in the State Health Insurance Plan (Section 108 – PEBA), that means the present version of the SC State Budget as of May 7 still requires South Carolina taxpayers to fund PLANNED PARENTHOOD for now and to fund certain ‘Abortions’. If even one child in the womb is murdered during FY 2019-2020 ( July 1, 2019 – June 30, 2020 ) using funds appropriated in H4000 as approved May 7 by SC House members, and in applicable House Roll Call votes on March 12, March 13, then each and every House member voting to appropriate such money, or voting against efforts to stop the appropriation of such money, will consequently thereby be an accessory to murder before-the-fact, the fraudulent, unrighteous, immoral, and unconstitutional Opinion of the US Supreme Court in Roe v Wade notwithstanding.

Note: The SC DHHS funding of Planned Parenthood is NOT directly for surgical or RU-486 “abortions”, but for so-called “family planning funds”, which may include chemically abortifacient “birth control”. Any government (taxpayer) money given to Planned Parenthood helps sustain their operation as a child-murder center. Two of the three stand-alone child-murder centers remaining in South Carolina are operated by Planned Parenthood [ located in Charleston and Columbia ].

______________________
______________________

Note: This Report below, prior to editing, initially sent out by text on May 8, 2019.

[ Edited ]

Columbia, SC May 7, 2019

‘Republican-Super-Majority SC House amends SC Senate April 18 version of SC State Budget ( H4000) by first restoring House version passed March 13, including Planned Parenhood Funding ( DHHS) and ‘Abortion’ Funding ( PEBA); Amdt 1A adopted by 110-0 Vote‘

SC House: 79 R’s, 44 D’s, 1 vac.

See Amdt No. 1A; passed by vote of 110 Yeas, 0 Nays

SC House Journal for 5/7/2019
https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess123_2019-2020/hj19/20190507.htm
—–

H.4000, SC State Budget for FY 2019-2020 – Part 1B, Section 33 (DHHS)
– As Passed by the SC House of Representatives on March 13, 2019

See ineffective Proviso 33.25, allowing Planned Parenthood funding to continue for now:
https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess123_2019-2020/appropriations2019/hpp1b.htm#s33

(used instead of SC Governor McMaster’s effective Planned Parenthood de-funding Proviso 33.24
[ page down to page 327 ] from his 2019 proposed Executive Budget)
—–

H.4000, SC State Budget for FY 2019-2020 – Part 1B, Section 108 (PEBA)
– As Passed by the SC House of Representative on March 13, 2019

See Proviso 108.4 funding for certain “abortions” in SC State Health Insurance Plan:
https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess123_2019-2020/appropriations2019/hpp1b.htm#s108
—–

“Where there is no vision, the people perish:…”
Proverb 29:18, KJV

Columbia Christians for Life

ChristianLifeandLiberty .net

‘SC Senate approves State Budget with Planned Parenthood and certain ‘Abortion’ Funding, by 38-6 Vote, April 18, 2019′

Columbia Christians for Life

http://christiansforpersonhood.com/index.php/2019/05/06/sc-senate-approves-state-budget-with-planned-parenthood-and-certain-abortion-funding-by-38-6-vote-april-18-2019/
____________________________